What users are saying about
8 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.9 out of 100
7 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.8 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

  • CloudFoundry ranks higher in 1 feature set: Platform-as-a-Service

Platform-as-a-Service

9.8

CloudFoundry

98%
5.0

Oracle Application Container Cloud

50%
CloudFoundry ranks higher in 6/11 features

Ease of building user interfaces

10.0
100%
1 Rating
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Scalability

9.0
90%
1 Rating
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Development environment creation

10.0
100%
1 Rating
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Development environment replication

10.0
100%
1 Rating
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Issue recovery

10.0
100%
1 Rating
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Upgrades and platform fixes

10.0
100%
1 Rating
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Platform management overhead

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Workflow engine capability

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Platform access control

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Services-enabled integration

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Issue monitoring and notification

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Attribute Ratings

  • CloudFoundry is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

10.0

CloudFoundry

100%
1 Rating
5.0

Oracle Application Container Cloud

50%
1 Rating

Likelihood to Renew

CloudFoundry

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0

Oracle Application Container Cloud

50%
1 Rating

Usability

CloudFoundry

N/A
0 Ratings
9.0

Oracle Application Container Cloud

90%
1 Rating

Support Rating

CloudFoundry

N/A
0 Ratings
8.0

Oracle Application Container Cloud

80%
2 Ratings

Implementation Rating

CloudFoundry

N/A
0 Ratings
8.0

Oracle Application Container Cloud

80%
2 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

CloudFoundry

It's well suited if:
  • The organization has large number of applications that needs to be deployed frequently.
  • The organization is tied to the DevOps mindset.
  • The organization has programs in different languages.
  • The applications does not need EJB's support that servers like web logic provide.
It's less suited if:
  • The applications needs security configuration within the same CloudFoundry instance.
  • The organization, for whatever reason does not want developers to manage the instances.
Read full review

Oracle

For how it is used within the organization it is perfectly fine. We use it for benefits, salary, and vacation tracking. It does make it easy to find your information within the system and make changes.
Read full review

Pros

CloudFoundry

  • Support for Orgs and Spaces that allow for managing users and deployables within a large organization.
  • Easy deployment, deploying code is as simple as executing single line from CLI, thanks to build-packs.
  • Solid and rich CLI, that allows for various operations on the instance.
  • Isolated Virtual Machines called Droplets, that provide clean run time environment for the code. This used to be a problem with Weblogic and other application servers, where multiple applications are run on the same cluster and they share resources.
  • SSH capability for the droplet (isolated VM's are called droplets), that allows for real time viewing of the App code while the application is running.
  • Support for multiple languages, thanks to build-packs.
  • Support for horizontal scaling, scaling an instance horizontally is a breeze.
  • Support for configuring environment variable using the service bindings.
  • Supports memory and disk space limit allocation for individual applications.
  • Supports API's as well as workers (processes without endpoints)
  • Supports blue-green deployment with minimal down time
Read full review

Oracle

  • Ease of use.
  • User-friendly.
  • Sleek layout.
Read full review

Cons

CloudFoundry

  • Does not support stateful containers and that would be a nice to have.
  • Supports showing logs, but does not persist the logs anywhere. This makes relying on Cloud Foundry's logs very unreliable. The logs have to be persisted using other third party tools like Elk and Kibana.
Read full review

Oracle

  • Fewer tabs.
  • More direct access to information.
  • More insight into where approvals are within the system.
Read full review

Pricing Details

CloudFoundry

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

CloudFoundry editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Oracle Application Container Cloud

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    Oracle Application Container Cloud editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Likelihood to Renew

      CloudFoundry

      No answers on this topic

      Oracle

      I am not a part of the team that would make this decision but as far as I know they are happy with the platform and how it performs.
      Read full review

      Usability

      CloudFoundry

      No answers on this topic

      Oracle

      Incredibly easy to use and learn how to use. The interface is extremely easy to use.
      Read full review

      Support Rating

      CloudFoundry

      No answers on this topic

      Oracle

      The team who helps with the issue is very helpful when resolving the issue and usually can handle it in a very timely manner.
      Read full review

      Implementation Rating

      CloudFoundry

      No answers on this topic

      Oracle

      The system is very easy to use.
      Read full review

      Alternatives Considered

      CloudFoundry

      While Docker shines in providing support for volumes and stateful instances, Cloud foundry shines in providing support for deploying stateless services. Heroku shines in integrating with Git and using commits to git as hooks to trigger deployments right from the command line. But it does not provide on-premise solution that Cloud foundry provides.
      Read full review

      Oracle

      No answers on this topic

      Return on Investment

      CloudFoundry

      • Positive impact, since it simplifies the deployment time by a huge margin. Without cloud foundry, deploying a code needs coordination with infrastructure teams, while with cloud foundry, its a simple one line command. This reduces the deployment time from at least few hours to few minutes. Faster deployments promote faster dev cycle iterations.
      • Code maintenance such as upgrading a Node or Java version is as simple as updating the build-pack. Without cloud foundry, using web logic, the specific version only supports a specific version of Java. So updating the version involves upgrading the version of web logic that needs to involve few teams. So without cloud foundry, it takes at least few days, with cloud foundry, its a matter of few mins.
      • Overall, happier Developers and thats harder to quantify.
      Read full review

      Oracle

      • Employee Empowerment
      • Reduced lagtime
      • Connects correct people to correct situations
      Read full review

      Add comparison