TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CloudFoundry

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ACloudFoundry is a free, open source cloud computing platform supported by the non-profit CloudFoundry. It is not tied to any particular cloud service, but can be self-hosted or run on any cloud service preferred.N/A

    WSO2 Developer Platform

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AWSO2 Developer Platform (formerly WSO2 Choreo) is an AI-native Internal Developer Platform (IDP) that functions as a unified control plane for cloud-native application delivery. The platform provides a centralized internal developer portal and execution engine to abstract underlying infrastructure complexity, standardize deployments, and automate the software development lifecycle across Kubernetes environments.

    $0

    1 project, up to 5 components

    Pricing
    CloudFoundryWSO2 Developer Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Free
    $0
    1 project, up to 5 components. $100 in Choreo infrastructure credits per month.
    Pay-As-You-Go
    $150
    per month Up to 10 projects and 30 components. $150 per component per month. Pass-through infrastructure costs.
    Enterprise
    Custom Quote
    per year Unlimited projects and components. Discounts based on annual commitments available. Pass-through infrastructure costs, or use a data plane.
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CloudFoundryWSO2 Developer Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—1 step is a maximum of 500ms of compute time. An incoming event, message, or outgoing API call is a minimum of 1 step.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CloudFoundryWSO2 Developer Platform
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of CloudFoundry and WSO2 Developer Platform
    Feature
    CloudFoundry
    9.8
    1 Ratings
    24% above category average
    WSO2 Developer Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment creation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment replication10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue recovery10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CloudFoundryWSO2 Developer Platform
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CloudFoundryWSO2 Developer Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CloudFoundryWSO2 Developer Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    CloudFoundry
    It's well suited if:
    • The organization has large number of applications that needs to be deployed frequently.
    • The organization is tied to the DevOps mindset.
    • The organization has programs in different languages.
    • The applications does not need EJB's support that servers like web logic provide.
    It's less suited if:
    • The applications needs security configuration within the same CloudFoundry instance.
    • The organization, for whatever reason does not want developers to manage the instances.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    While you are developing your code, my case is codes for bots, you'll have more power and if you have an API ally that shows forecasts of latencies and throughputs: Choreo by WS02 is that friend. It is very ideal in giving insights on intelligent data mapping, code anomalies as you develop the codes or applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    CloudFoundry
    • Support for Orgs and Spaces that allow for managing users and deployables within a large organization.
    • Easy deployment, deploying code is as simple as executing single line from CLI, thanks to build-packs.
    • Solid and rich CLI, that allows for various operations on the instance.
    • Isolated Virtual Machines called Droplets, that provide clean run time environment for the code. This used to be a problem with Weblogic and other application servers, where multiple applications are run on the same cluster and they share resources.
    • SSH capability for the droplet (isolated VM's are called droplets), that allows for real time viewing of the App code while the application is running.
    • Support for multiple languages, thanks to build-packs.
    • Support for horizontal scaling, scaling an instance horizontally is a breeze.
    • Support for configuring environment variable using the service bindings.
    • Supports memory and disk space limit allocation for individual applications.
    • Supports API's as well as workers (processes without endpoints)
    • Supports blue-green deployment with minimal down time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • Provides feedback in real time which sorts most of the API performance challenges.
    • Displays the estimated application performance as you compose your code.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    CloudFoundry
    • Does not support stateful containers and that would be a nice to have.
    • Supports showing logs, but does not persist the logs anywhere. This makes relying on Cloud Foundry's logs very unreliable. The logs have to be persisted using other third party tools like Elk and Kibana.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • Latency curves may be inaccurate sometimes or provide over/under estimates
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    CloudFoundry
    While Docker shines in providing support for volumes and stateful instances, Cloud foundry shines in providing support for deploying stateless services. Heroku shines in integrating with Git and using commits to git as hooks to trigger deployments right from the command line. But it does not provide on-premise solution that Cloud foundry provides.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    CloudFoundry
    • Positive impact, since it simplifies the deployment time by a huge margin. Without cloud foundry, deploying a code needs coordination with infrastructure teams, while with cloud foundry, its a simple one line command. This reduces the deployment time from at least few hours to few minutes. Faster deployments promote faster dev cycle iterations.
    • Code maintenance such as upgrading a Node or Java version is as simple as updating the build-pack. Without cloud foundry, using web logic, the specific version only supports a specific version of Java. So updating the version involves upgrading the version of web logic that needs to involve few teams. So without cloud foundry, it takes at least few days, with cloud foundry, its a matter of few mins.
    • Overall, happier Developers and thats harder to quantify.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • over 90 percent accuracy in performance prediction of bots under development
    • It's possible to trace on faulty codes, down to the machine-level details.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    WSO2 Developer Platform Screenshots

    Screenshot of Simultaneous graphical view and code viewScreenshot of API lifecycle managementScreenshot of Automated deploymentScreenshot of API marketplaceScreenshot of Deep observabilityScreenshot of AI-assisted development