Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CloudTest
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Akamai now owns and supports CloudTest, a load and performance testing solution, developed by SOASTA and acquired with the company in 2017.N/A
LoadRunner Professional
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
Pricing
Akamai CloudTestOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudTestLoadRunner Professional
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Akamai CloudTestOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Considered Both Products
CloudTest

No answer on this topic

LoadRunner Professional
Chose OpenText LoadRunner Professional
While soasta is currently being used for cloud related applications, LR is specifically used to address the load testing on on-premise servers in our case.
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Akamai CloudTestOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
Akamai CloudTest
7.2
1 Ratings
16% below category average
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
8.4
6 Ratings
0% below category average
End to end performance management6.01 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Integrated performance data8.01 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.01 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Real time monitoring6.01 Ratings6.15 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection7.01 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Akamai CloudTestOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Akamai CloudTestOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Akamai CloudTestOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
Akamai
We were designing an Airlines reservation system, where we wanted to check the maximum number if reservation our system can handle, this tool helped us to get the test results but the issue was from set up point of view, the initial set up took too much time. But we were able to achieve our Reservation system process.
Read full review
OpenText
Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
Read full review
Pros
Akamai
  • Integration Call's like REST
  • Integration Call's like SOAP
  • Performance Testing
  • Load Testing on Load Balancer
Read full review
OpenText
  • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
  • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
  • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
Read full review
Cons
Akamai
  • Report generation is difficult
  • Some graphs are not displaying accurate results
  • More information are missing with respect to load testing
Read full review
OpenText
  • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
  • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
  • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
  • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
Read full review
Support Rating
Akamai
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Akamai
The bundle of features that other tools provide is much higher when compared to the one provided by Akamai CloudTest, this is something they need to focus on Priority. Most tools comes with default setup and ends to end testing scenario that can be covered, such as Regression testing. From Akamai CloudTest this is a missing features that can be added up soon.
Read full review
OpenText
HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Akamai
  • System Hangs as where severe load testing is required
  • Authentication is an issue when using OAUTH
  • Scalability can be improved and also an on premise tool can be of great help
Read full review
OpenText
  • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
  • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
Read full review
ScreenShots