Cloudwords vs. IBM Watson Speech to Text

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cloudwords
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Cloudwords headquartered in San Francisco, California offers their eponymous translation automation platform.N/A
IBM Watson Speech to Text
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Speech to Text supports conversion of audio and voice recordings to text in applications.N/A
Pricing
CloudwordsIBM Watson Speech to Text
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudwordsIBM Watson Speech to Text
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CloudwordsIBM Watson Speech to Text
User Ratings
CloudwordsIBM Watson Speech to Text
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CloudwordsIBM Watson Speech to Text
Likelihood to Recommend
Cloudwords
Cloudwords is well suited for getting translations of specific docs from users who are from a different language speaking area. in the past, we've tried to translate on our own, but it is time consuming and not always accurate, so cloudwords save us time and money with translation services
Read full review
IBM
I would definitely recommend it, as it is one of the best speech-to-text applications available on the market. I gave 7 out of 10 because of the integration with third-party tools. Most organizations don't use the IBM ecosystem and are limited to a single environment, so they need to be easily integrated without being overly complex.
Read full review
Pros
Cloudwords
  • integrations with Eloqua
  • easy translations
  • keeps things organized
Read full review
IBM
  • Low latency Real time meeting transcription
  • Meeting summary
  • Customer call summary
  • Automatic speech recognition
Read full review
Cons
Cloudwords
  • When errors arise, it's difficult to determine where the error is from, Cloudowrds or our system.
  • faster timelines for approvals
  • infrequently, the translation quality is not 100 percent correct.
Read full review
IBM
  • Integration with third party tools.
  • Processing time for longer meetings.
  • Catches the background sound/narration, but can be reduced using noise-cancelling channels.
Read full review
Usability
Cloudwords
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM Watson Speech-to-Text usability is excellent, and I highly recommend it as well. It is faster, takes accurate notes, and summarizes the points accurately. Also, it is very easy to navigate through the transcripts. If there is a long team meeting, one can jump to the information without wasting much time, as it also reduces manual work.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cloudwords
This service is often incorrect and sloppy with translations
Read full review
IBM
It provides more flexible plans as compared to others. These plans are affordable for Small and medium-scale enterprises. They also offer free trial. IBM Watson has wider integration support with the help of API. It has very low latency in real time transcription. Also there is a formatting feature to Transcribe dates, times, currency etc as per the desired format
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cloudwords
  • Saves money on hiring a translator
  • brings in clients from other countries
  • helps us to communicate with clients more efficiently.
Read full review
IBM
  • Improving productivity
  • Less communication gap
  • better customer services
  • global collaboration made easy.
Read full review
ScreenShots