TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    codeBeamer ALM

    Score6.4 out of 10
    N/AIntland Software's codeBeamer ALM is a scalable Agile Application Lifecycle Management platform that focuses on traceability and compliance. codeBeamer ALM supports both Agile and Waterfall, and offers a scalable solution for both small and large organisations to develop better products faster. The vendor says their customers think about the benefits of codeBeamer ALM in terms of higher efficiency and effectiveness along the lifecycle, with the goal of cutting development time and…N/A

    GoCD

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AGoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A
    Pricing
    codeBeamer ALMGoCD
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    codeBeamer ALMGoCD
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPerpetual and rented licenses available. Named users & floating license types can be combined.—
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    codeBeamer ALMGoCD
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    codeBeamer ALMGoCD
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    codeBeamer ALMGoCD
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Intland Software
    In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    Previously, our team used Jenkins. However, since it's a shared deployment resource we don't have admin access. We tried GoCD as it's open source and we really like. We set up our deployment pipeline to run whenever codes are merged to master, run the unit test and revert back if it doesn't pass. Once it's deployed to the staging environment, we can simply do 1-click to deploy the appropriate version to production. We use this to deploy to an on-prem server and also AWS. Some deployment pipelines use custom Powershell script for.Net application, some others use Bash script to execute the docker push and cloud formation template to build elastic beanstalk.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Intland Software
    • Tracing of requirements.
    • Tracking of development.
    • Tracking of QA.
    • Tracking of bugs.
    • Tracking of releases.
    • Wiki.
    • Users and teams.
    • Works for teams scattered across the globe.
    • Testing and coverage for releases.
    • Integration with SVN.
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
    • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
    • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Intland Software
    • Search.
    • Metric calculation.
    • Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    • UI can be improved
    • Location for settings can be re-arranged
    • API for setting up pipeline
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Intland Software
    Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Intland Software
    Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Intland Software
    codeBeamer is by far better.
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    GoCD is easier to setup, but harder to customize at runtime. There's no way to trigger a pipeline with custom parameters.
    Jenkins is more flexible at runtime. You can define multiple user-provided parameters so when user needs to trigger a build, there's a form for him/her to input the parameters.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Intland Software
    • Customer tracking.
    • Process tracking.
    • Workflow framework.
    • Can be overhead.
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    • ROI has been good since it's open source
    • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
    • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    codeBeamer ALM Screenshots

    Screenshot of Baselined tracker management with suspected linksScreenshot of Versioned test management for automated and manual testing (with parametrized test cases)Screenshot of Easily exportable & automated dashboards and reports for management and audit supportScreenshot of Gapless traceability throughout the development lifecycle