codeBeamer ALM vs. PractiTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
codeBeamer ALM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Intland Software's codeBeamer ALM is a scalable Agile Application Lifecycle Management platform that focuses on traceability and compliance. codeBeamer ALM supports both Agile and Waterfall, and offers a scalable solution for both small and large organisations to develop better products faster. The vendor says their customers think about the benefits of codeBeamer ALM in terms of higher efficiency and effectiveness along the lifecycle, with the goal of cutting development time and…N/A
PractiTest
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.
$39
user
Pricing
codeBeamer ALMPractiTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$39.00
user
Enterprise
$49.00
user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
codeBeamer ALMPractiTest
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsPerpetual and rented licenses available. Named users & floating license types can be combined.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
codeBeamer ALMPractiTest
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Features
codeBeamer ALMPractiTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
codeBeamer ALM
-
Ratings
PractiTest
8.4
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
codeBeamer ALMPractiTest
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
TestComplete
TestComplete
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
Micro Focus ALM / Quality Center
Micro Focus ALM / Quality Center
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
Micro Focus ALM / Quality Center
Micro Focus ALM / Quality Center
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
codeBeamer ALMPractiTest
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
codeBeamer ALMPractiTest
Likelihood to Recommend
Intland Software
In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc
Read full review
PractiTest
PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
Read full review
Pros
Intland Software
  • Tracing of requirements.
  • Tracking of development.
  • Tracking of QA.
  • Tracking of bugs.
  • Tracking of releases.
  • Wiki.
  • Users and teams.
  • Works for teams scattered across the globe.
  • Testing and coverage for releases.
  • Integration with SVN.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Effective Test case template.
  • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
  • Report generation.
Read full review
Cons
Intland Software
  • Search.
  • Metric calculation.
  • Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
Read full review
Usability
Intland Software
Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc
Read full review
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Intland Software
Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.
Read full review
PractiTest
The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Intland Software
codeBeamer is by far better.
Read full review
PractiTest
I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Intland Software
  • Customer tracking.
  • Process tracking.
  • Workflow framework.
  • Can be overhead.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Test Reporting
  • Defect Management
Read full review
ScreenShots

codeBeamer ALM Screenshots

Screenshot of Baselined tracker management with suspected linksScreenshot of Versioned test management for automated and manual testing (with parametrized test cases)Screenshot of Easily exportable & automated dashboards and reports for management and audit supportScreenshot of Gapless traceability throughout the development lifecycle

PractiTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of