codeBeamer ALM vs. SAP Process Control

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
codeBeamer ALM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Intland Software's codeBeamer ALM is a scalable Agile Application Lifecycle Management platform that focuses on traceability and compliance. codeBeamer ALM supports both Agile and Waterfall, and offers a scalable solution for both small and large organisations to develop better products faster. The vendor says their customers think about the benefits of codeBeamer ALM in terms of higher efficiency and effectiveness along the lifecycle, with the goal of cutting development time and…N/A
SAP Process Control
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP Process Control Simplifies uses continuous control monitoring, and streamlined testing, and reduces risk with real-time insight into control status and key issues. It can be deployed on premise or in the cloud.N/A
Pricing
codeBeamer ALMSAP Process Control
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
codeBeamer ALMSAP Process Control
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPerpetual and rented licenses available. Named users & floating license types can be combined.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
codeBeamer ALMSAP Process Control
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
codeBeamer ALMSAP Process Control
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
codeBeamer ALM
-
Ratings
SAP Process Control
6.8
3 Ratings
15% below category average
Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings8.63 Ratings
Risk management00 Ratings7.23 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
GRC policy management00 Ratings6.93 Ratings
Incident management00 Ratings6.62 Ratings
Best Alternatives
codeBeamer ALMSAP Process Control
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Rencore Code (SPCAF)
Rencore Code (SPCAF)
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
codeBeamer ALMSAP Process Control
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(1 ratings)
7.5
(3 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
codeBeamer ALMSAP Process Control
Likelihood to Recommend
Intland Software
In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc
Read full review
SAP
In my opinion, SAP Process Control is well suited for bigger companies with an already mature Internal Control System as well as for bigger companies who want to completely new/redesign the internal control system. The size of the company, as well as the budget, is quite important when thinking about the implementation of SAP Process Control. A smaller company with e.g., 150 people should think more about implementing SAP FCM.
Read full review
Pros
Intland Software
  • Tracing of requirements.
  • Tracking of development.
  • Tracking of QA.
  • Tracking of bugs.
  • Tracking of releases.
  • Wiki.
  • Users and teams.
  • Works for teams scattered across the globe.
  • Testing and coverage for releases.
  • Integration with SVN.
Read full review
SAP
  • Native connection to SAP applications
  • Automated monitoring process of SAP applications
  • Workflow capabilities for control testing
Read full review
Cons
Intland Software
  • Search.
  • Metric calculation.
  • Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.
Read full review
SAP
  • Default delivery of controls could be done by SAP on some basic controls like client openings, password controls, etc
  • The messaging or customization of messages in different workflows is limited, which could be introduced to enhance the product
  • SAP Process control does not have the capability for cloud product monitoring which is required with more SAP cloud products available right now
Read full review
Usability
Intland Software
Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Intland Software
Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Intland Software
codeBeamer is by far better.
Read full review
SAP
The connectivity with other SAP products out of the SAP GRC suite, like Access Control and so on, was key for the decision. Also we had an already mature SAP System landscape as well as having internal processes that were similar to the SAP Process Control standard processes helped us with the decision to implement SAP Process Control.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Intland Software
  • Customer tracking.
  • Process tracking.
  • Workflow framework.
  • Can be overhead.
Read full review
SAP
  • Automated alerts for controls issues
  • Workflow capabilities; however, there's natively only 2 levels of review. More layers would be beneficial.
Read full review
ScreenShots

codeBeamer ALM Screenshots

Screenshot of Baselined tracker management with suspected linksScreenshot of Versioned test management for automated and manual testing (with parametrized test cases)Screenshot of Easily exportable & automated dashboards and reports for management and audit supportScreenshot of Gapless traceability throughout the development lifecycle