codeBeamer ALM vs. OneSumX for Anti-Money Laundering (AML)

In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc

Wolters Kluwer OneSumX is a perfect fit for almost all financial risk management needs. More to running financial risk analytics to help you keep an eye out on any possible financial risk, it offers outstanding functionalities in entire business regulatory analytics and reporting to help you run your business within its regulatory compliance.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Tracing of requirements.
• Tracking of development.
• Tracking of QA.
• Tracking of bugs.
• Tracking of releases.
• Wiki.
• Users and teams.
• Works for teams scattered across the globe.
• Testing and coverage for releases.
• Integration with SVN.

• It is easy to run various scenario analyses and stress testing on various financial activities in order to get useful metrics about possible financial risks.
• It allows one to easily and fast process even huge amounts of data thus saving time and resources spent performing these activities.
• It is flexible and easy to customize in order to fit your working criteria so as to best meet your financial risk management needs.
• It is easy to have a full review of the entire balance sheet for easy data modelling.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Search.
• Metric calculation.
• Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.

• The price of the payment packages is a little bit high and this means it is not suitable for use by small-scaled businesses.
• It has a wider range of features whose usage needs some time to train and master. This consumes extra resources and time.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc

Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.

codeBeamer is by far better.

Everything about Wolters Kluwer OneSumX stands out when compared to other similar products. Talk of its well-organized interface and dashboard, the number and quality of financial risk management features all the way to the quality of the support offered by the support team. Its ease of deployment is another standalone factor.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Customer tracking.
• Process tracking.
• Workflow framework.
• Can be overhead.

• It has helped us to streamline our financial risk management experience such that we are able to detect possible financial risks in good time and deal with them accordingly.
• It has helped us to generate accurate and transparent regulatory reports that
• guides us in ensure regulatory compliance is met.
• It has allowed us to run analyses on our financial processes based on different scenarios in order to detect possible financial risk threats.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info