TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Codefresh

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ACodefresh is a continuous integration/delivery and automation platform for Kubernetes that allows users to build, test, deploy and gather feedback on apps, from Octopus Deploy.N/A

    GoCD

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AGoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A
    Pricing
    CodefreshGoCD
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CodefreshGoCD
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    CodefreshGoCD
    Small Businesses
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CodefreshGoCD
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CodefreshGoCD
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Octopus Deploy
    While deploying docker images on kubernetes pods I must say Codefresh helped me a lot. It has made my work easy as an Automation tool. I can setup a simple pipelines to automate my build for kubernetes. but for more complex pipelines Codefresh need some improvement
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    Previously, our team used Jenkins. However, since it's a shared deployment resource we don't have admin access. We tried GoCD as it's open source and we really like. We set up our deployment pipeline to run whenever codes are merged to master, run the unit test and revert back if it doesn't pass. Once it's deployed to the staging environment, we can simply do 1-click to deploy the appropriate version to production. We use this to deploy to an on-prem server and also AWS. Some deployment pipelines use custom Powershell script for.Net application, some others use Bash script to execute the docker push and cloud formation template to build elastic beanstalk.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Octopus Deploy
    • Continuous Integration and Continuous Development. we can setup jobs that automatically triggered when there is any changes in code and starts building up the build images automatically and then pushing images to Container Registry
    • We can involve Version control system like github, bitbucket, gitlab etc for integration of Codefresh with our code stored in these Version control systems.
    • On the failure of any jobs/pipeline Codefresh can also send Notification on our email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
    • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
    • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Octopus Deploy
    • With Codefresh it's become hard to handle complex pipelines
    • Need to focus more on Documentation part
    • UI can be more attractive
    • Security can be more increased
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    • UI can be improved
    • Location for settings can be re-arranged
    • API for setting up pipeline
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Octopus Deploy
    It's very scalable It is cost effective It easily get integrated with third party tools It easily get integrated with Kubernetes Docker.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    GoCD is easier to setup, but harder to customize at runtime. There's no way to trigger a pipeline with custom parameters.
    Jenkins is more flexible at runtime. You can define multiple user-provided parameters so when user needs to trigger a build, there's a form for him/her to input the parameters.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Octopus Deploy
    • Positive:
    • As an Automation tools I must say it has reduced manual labour , reduced errors and improved quality of work.
    • It easily get integrated with third party tools which increases ease ness in our work
    • Negative:
    • Although being a very good tools in CI/CD
    • It requires improvement in UI, it's speed, security, optimization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThoughtWorks
    • ROI has been good since it's open source
    • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
    • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots