TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Codefresh

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ACodefresh is a continuous integration/delivery and automation platform for Kubernetes that allows users to build, test, deploy and gather feedback on apps, from Octopus Deploy.N/A

    HashiCorp Packer

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AHashiCorp Packer automates the creation of machine images, coming out of the box with support to build images for Amazon EC2, CloudStack, DigitalOcean, Docker, Google Compute Engine, Microsoft Azure, QEMU, VirtualBox, and VMware.N/A
    Pricing
    CodefreshHashiCorp Packer
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CodefreshHashiCorp Packer
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    CodefreshHashiCorp Packer
    Small Businesses
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CodefreshHashiCorp Packer
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CodefreshHashiCorp Packer
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Octopus Deploy
    While deploying docker images on kubernetes pods I must say Codefresh helped me a lot. It has made my work easy as an Automation tool. I can setup a simple pipelines to automate my build for kubernetes. but for more complex pipelines Codefresh need some improvement
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    We use packer to generate new machine images for multiple platforms on every change to our Configuration Management tools like Chef/Puppet/Ansible It's act single tool for Image building for Multi-provider like AWS/Azure/GCP Helps to achieve Dev/Prod Parity Packer itself doesn't have a state like Terraform. You can't do packer output AMI ID. If you have a scenario where you want to maintain the state for images it would be tough to manage via Packer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Octopus Deploy
    • Continuous Integration and Continuous Development. we can setup jobs that automatically triggered when there is any changes in code and starts building up the build images automatically and then pushing images to Container Registry
    • We can involve Version control system like github, bitbucket, gitlab etc for integration of Codefresh with our code stored in these Version control systems.
    • On the failure of any jobs/pipeline Codefresh can also send Notification on our email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Multi-provider portability
    • Greater testability
    • Super fast infrastructure deployment
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Octopus Deploy
    • With Codefresh it's become hard to handle complex pipelines
    • Need to focus more on Documentation part
    • UI can be more attractive
    • Security can be more increased
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Manageability
    • Manageability
    • Manageability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    We are happy with the use of Packer in our organization. Apart from manageability, I don't find any other drawback with Packer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It's best for building Image with many features and benefits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I only once required support and it was very smooth.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Octopus Deploy
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I haven't found any issue in Implementation that itself describes how well this tool is built.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Octopus Deploy
    It's very scalable It is cost effective It easily get integrated with third party tools It easily get integrated with Kubernetes Docker.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    There are lot of tools in market which does the job for Image creation but all of them are not complete Machine/Image as a code. All other alternatives can create Image partially. Main reason for selecting Packer are Packer is lightweight, portable, and command-line driven Packer helps keep development, staging, and production as similar as possible. Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image Multi-provider portability is the feature to die for
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Octopus Deploy
    • Positive:
    • As an Automation tools I must say it has reduced manual labour , reduced errors and improved quality of work.
    • It easily get integrated with third party tools which increases ease ness in our work
    • Negative:
    • Although being a very good tools in CI/CD
    • It requires improvement in UI, it's speed, security, optimization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Super fast infrastructure deployment
    • Quick turnaround of infrastructure in multiple cloud using single tool.
    • Increase productivity by reducing time in infrastructure building.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots