Cognite Data Fusion vs. Fivetran

Cognite Data Fusion

Fivetran

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cognite Data Fusion	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Cognite is a global industrial Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provider, offering their flagship Cognite Data Fusion industrial IoT solution that aims to enable IT and OT teams to successfully navigate complex industry change by reducing time spent on data-related tasks and accelerating digital use case development. Open Industrial Digital Twins built on Cognite Data Fusion enable faster use case development and scaling; an Open Industrial Digital Twin integrates all industrial data, connects to…	N/A
Fivetran	Score 8.4 out of 10	N/A	Fivetran replicates applications, databases, events and files into a high-performance data warehouse, after a five minute setup. The vendor says their standardized cloud pipelines are fully managed and zero-maintenance. The vendor says Fivetran began with a realization: For modern companies using cloud-based software and storage, traditional ETL tools badly underperformed, and the complicated configurations they required often led to project failures. To streamline and accelerate…	$0.01 per credit

Pricing

Cognite Data Fusion

Fivetran

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Starter: $0.01
per credit
Standard: $0.01
per credit
Enterprise: $0.01
per credit

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cognite Data Fusion	Fivetran
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

Contact vendor for pricing information.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cognite Data Fusion	Fivetran
Considered Both Products	Cognite Data Fusion No answer on this topic	Fivetran Verified User Anonymous Chose Fivetran Matillion requires a lot more initial setup effort and the resulting schemas are also much more "raw" data than the nicely cleaned schemas which Fivetran provides. Therefore it would also require more (manual) post-processing efforts compared to Fivetran. So the savings on time … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fivetran Fivetran is much easier to set up and maintain. Airbyte still had a degree of technical knowledge requirement that we didn't have the resources to commit. Fivetran allowed a non-technical employee to establish pipelines and immediately start using the data without having to … Incentivized Helpful? Uddipan Mukherjee Big Data Specialist Chose Fivetran Fivetran is a powerful data replication tool that supported use cases for organization-wide data platforms. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fivetran We never seriously considered using anything else. Our data engineers had used Fivetran extensively in previous roles so when it came time to make a decision, there wasn't much of a process. They gladly signed the contract with Fivetran pretty quickly. Incentivized Helpful? Sudarshan Kothari Senior Data Scientist Chose Fivetran Fivetran came well with the connectors' availability and updates with the source changes. We had an idea on data requirements in our case which helped us to work out on cost implication and take a decision for Fivetran as a data provider for our organization. These were 2 … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fivetran Fivetran is more intuitive and easier to use than code-based ETL/ELT tools. The data modelling Fivetran performs makes the data more usable more quickly. Fivetran's dbt support and integration is unique. Incentivized Helpful? Scott Laronge Head of Data Science Chose Fivetran Honestly, we haven't done much investigation in a while, it just works 360 days of the year. The other five days there may be a hiccup that will throw us a day off of data, but it gets caught up in the end. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Cognite Data Fusion

Fivetran

Data Source Connection

Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
	Cognite Data Fusion - Ratings	Fivetran 10.0 Ratings 19% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings

Data Transformations

Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
	Cognite Data Fusion - Ratings	Fivetran 7.4 Ratings 9% below category average
Simple transformations	00 Ratings	7.50 Ratings
Complex transformations	00 Ratings	7.40 Ratings

Data Modeling

Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
	Cognite Data Fusion - Ratings	Fivetran 6.2 Ratings 24% below category average
Data model creation	00 Ratings	2.00 Ratings
Metadata management	00 Ratings	4.00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Collaboration	00 Ratings	7.80 Ratings
Testing and debugging	00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings

Data Governance

Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
	Cognite Data Fusion - Ratings	Fivetran 8.3 Ratings 3% above category average
Integration with data quality tools	00 Ratings	8.30 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools	00 Ratings	8.30 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cognite Data Fusion	Fivetran
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	Skyvia Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Cisco Catalyst IE3400 Rugged Series Switches Score 9.0 out of 10	IBM InfoSphere Information Server Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises	No answers on this topic	IBM InfoSphere Information Server Score 8.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cognite Data Fusion	Fivetran
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cognite Data Fusion	Fivetran
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	[Fivetran is] very well suited when you are using popular and common data sources, such as the major ad platforms, and SaaS platforms such as Salesforce. If the majority of your data sources are custom internal applications or databases, may be less value as you aren't leveraging the delivered connectors. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Simplified ETL from a wide range of data sources Stable and painless data pipeline Granular control over what parts of the data source are loaded Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Doesn't include support for a Kinesis stream as a data source so couldn't be used for some use cases under consideration Doesn't support the use of "BEFORE DELETE" triggers No support for serverless Aurora Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	Very easy and intuitive to setup and maintain as there usually are not that many options. Very well documented (e.g. how to setup each connector, how the schema looks like, any specific features of this connector etc.). Also the operation is intuitive, e.g. you have status pages, log pages, configuration pages etc. for each connector. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Performance	No answers on this topic	It runs pretty well and gets our data from point A to point cluster quickly enough. Honestly, it's not something I think about unless it breaks and that's pretty rare. Incentivized Scott Laronge Head of Data Science Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Fivetran came well with the connectors' availability and updates with the source changes. We had an idea on data requirements in our case which helped us to work out on cost implication and take a decision for Fivetran as a data provider for our organization. These were 2 places where Fivetran out-performed, other vendors. Incentivized Sudarshan Kothari Senior Data Scientist Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Saved a lot of manual development days (unable to quantify) Accelerated the time to add a new source to the data warehouse a lot Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots