Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) vs. Cynet 360

It seems to be one of the best AV products that I have used. One issue that I have is with billing/invoicing and how the licenses are issued.

Incentivized

All type of malicious attacks on endpoints whether it is known threat or unknown. Better ransomware & zero-day coverage.It helps organization with deeper visibility in to security incidents,unmatched protection & incident response service.

Incentivized

• Mitigates exposure to unwanted files and malware.
• Ease of Use and Management.
• Administrator control unlike standard antivirus purchased in the consumer/small business market.

Incentivized

• Lots of information to analyze
• Strong services expertise
• Comprehensive host information analysis

Incentivized

• Stability, they could grow when it comes to updates to the client. There always seems to be complications.
• Locking of systems. In the event of trouble, systems lock down so far that the administrator has to drive to the location where device is located, uninstall and reinstall.

Incentivized

• Glitches in the dashboard, some alerts don't reflect.
• UI is a little complex..

Incentivized

I was using a platform called Barkly which seemed to work well at the time. I ran a ransomware simulation against Barkly and it did not perform as well as anticipated. I began searching for another AV platform, found Comodo and decided to run the same ransomware test. Comodo [Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP)] performed much better and was more effective at stopping the simulated ransomware.

Incentivized

It's simply better, more robust, easier to use user interface, better CyOps support, packaged solution without needing all the add-ons of the noted solutions.

Incentivized

• Increased [efficiency]
• Can centrally manage the endpoints
• Mitigation of threats/vulnerabilities to the endpoint

Incentivized

• Protected us from advanced threats.

Incentivized