TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Comodo Firewall

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AComodo Cybersecurity headquartered in New Jersey offers the Comodo Firewall to deliver security controls to moderate size businesses.

    $29.99

    per year per user

    SoftEther VPN

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    Comodo FirewallSoftEther VPN
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Comodo FirewallSoftEther VPN
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Comodo FirewallSoftEther VPN
    Firewall
    Comparison of Firewall features of Comodo Firewall and SoftEther VPN
    Feature
    Comodo Firewall
    7.0
    1 Ratings
    20% below category average
    SoftEther VPN
    -
    Ratings
    Identification Technologies7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visualization Tools6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content Inspection7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Policy-based Controls10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Firewall Management Console6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting and Logging5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Proxy Server8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Virtual Private Network
    Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Comodo Firewall and SoftEther VPN
    Feature
    Comodo Firewall
    -
    Ratings
    SoftEther VPN
    9.9
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    AES 256-bit Encryption00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Kill Switch00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multi-Platform Support00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Split Tunneling00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    IP Address Masking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    No-Logs Policy00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multiple Server Locations00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Automatic Wi-Fi Protection00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Simultaneous Connections00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Customer Support Services00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Comodo FirewallSoftEther VPN
    Small Businesses
    SonicWall NSA Series
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
    Score9.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Comodo FirewallSoftEther VPN
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Comodo FirewallSoftEther VPN
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Comodo
    In an enterprise, where there is a threshold of many new users with whom there is a need to share the internet, Comodo Firewall can really ease the burden. Security of network and infrastructure increases with less cost compared to other alternatives. Allows advanced users to create advanced scenarios and deal with them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    SoftEther VPN works easily, and extremely well through Azure, client-to-server, and in Layer 3 bridge mode between offices but it is not so easy to use from mobile devices, although we have had success, albeit with difficulty in the configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Comodo
    • Beginner friendly UI
    • Extensibility for pro users
    • Very low on system resources
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    • It just works—I have never had a single call from a client or end-user complaining that their VPN wasn't working.
    • It can be configured to be super easy for end-users to use—Nearly transparent to them, in fact.
    • It is very lightweight on devices and works extremely fast. So fast, in fact, that about the only issue I ever have with SoftEther VPN are related to users sometimes forgetting they are working remotely.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Comodo
    • Provide package for Linux systems as well.
    • Pricing is still not friendly for casual users.
    • Allow API integration with web application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    • We have has some issues where their default port won't connect through an AT&T wireless AP, but creating an exception for it on the AP or changing the port always gets it working.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Comodo
    Although AWS WAF is really nice and convenient, it only runs on a web application level, no doubt it has no match in that particular segment, and it is prone to vendor locking. Comodo on the other hand provides better service on the system and network level. if you have to choose a better UI, Comodo is the best solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    I had experienced several reliability issues soon after Pertino VPN-as-a-Service was acquired by Cradlepoint where the service would go down for a supposed update but would be down for long periods. And that was just one of several issues that caused me grief. I started looking around for a suitable replacement and came across SoftEther VPN, a project by the University of Tsukuba, Japan, quite by accident. I fell in love with its ease of implementation, low device cost, ease of Admin control, and ease of use for end-users, in addition to its near-zero downtime reliability, and the fact that I have total control over its operation and maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Comodo
    • For enterprise level company, it has really great ROI.
    • Not perfect fit for individual use or for small company.
    • We streamlined the process of managing network security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    • I went from a Pertino/Cradlepoint VPN-as-a-Service requiring no hardware to a SoftEther VPN Client/Server configuration and that required the purchase of a tiny server to run SEVPN. It could have been a Linux box or Windows and I chose Windows, so there was a minimal cost for the Windows 10 device but it eliminated the monthly service cost and has historically been far more reliable.
    • We went from about $12/user/month on Cradlepoint perimeter81 to $0/user/month after about a $500 investment in hardware, so just one of my clients has been saving $300/month after the initial $500 for the "Server" device.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots