Conductrics V3 vs. Django Waffle

Best suited for high tech companies, or companies with DEVs that have a lot of experience.

Incentivized

I would recommend that engineers look to try Django Waffle for feature development within a team setting; it really streamlines flipping features on and off for testing. I think the simplicity of Django Waffle is pretty great, but it may be a limitation for those developing far more complex products.

Incentivized

• Splitting traffic
• Customer support
• Advanced testing

Incentivized

• User-friendly syntax
• Easy installation
• Lightweight and supported, so not much in the way of bugs

Incentivized

• Requires high technical abilities
• Setting up reporting metrics can be tedious
• Complex to link with other reporting sources

Incentivized

• Not as complex as Gutter, albeit suitable for most product needs that I've encountered

Incentivized

It's complex if you aren't sure what to look for, documentation is complex as well. But they have a great customer team that replies fast and is happy to help.

Incentivized

Harder to use but better metric reporting when it comes to statistical significance and confidence reporting.

Incentivized

I found Django Waffle to work seamlessly with my Django-native codebase, and the implementation was extremely fast and intuitive. Gargoyle offers a bit more in the way of building more complicated code segments, but it's also more complex to implement. I use Django Waffle for nearly every project involving feature flipping.

Incentivized

• Positive rev impact

Incentivized

• Easy to show clients different feature options without rewriting the whole codebase
• Faster feedback loops during testing
• Good for synchronizing team effort across the codebase

Incentivized