Conductrics V3 vs. Django Waffle

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Conductrics V3
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Conductrics offers a feature management and A/B testing platform for marketing and DevOps teams. API features include flowlets and AI capabilities - including machine learning powered feature flagging recommendations.N/A
Django Waffle
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Django Waffle is an open source feature management tool for Django.N/A
Pricing
Conductrics V3Django Waffle
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Conductrics V3Django Waffle
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Conductrics V3Django Waffle
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Conductrics V3Django Waffle
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
4.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Conductrics V3Django Waffle
Likelihood to Recommend
Conductrics
Best suited for high tech companies, or companies with DEVs that have a lot of experience.
Read full review
Open Source
I would recommend that engineers look to try Django Waffle for feature development within a team setting; it really streamlines flipping features on and off for testing. I think the simplicity of Django Waffle is pretty great, but it may be a limitation for those developing far more complex products.
Read full review
Pros
Conductrics
  • Splitting traffic
  • Customer support
  • Advanced testing
Read full review
Open Source
  • User-friendly syntax
  • Easy installation
  • Lightweight and supported, so not much in the way of bugs
Read full review
Cons
Conductrics
  • Requires high technical abilities
  • Setting up reporting metrics can be tedious
  • Complex to link with other reporting sources
Read full review
Open Source
  • Not as complex as Gutter, albeit suitable for most product needs that I've encountered
Read full review
Usability
Conductrics
It's complex if you aren't sure what to look for, documentation is complex as well. But they have a great customer team that replies fast and is happy to help.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Conductrics
Harder to use but better metric reporting when it comes to statistical significance and confidence reporting.
Read full review
Open Source
I found Django Waffle to work seamlessly with my Django-native codebase, and the implementation was extremely fast and intuitive. Gargoyle offers a bit more in the way of building more complicated code segments, but it's also more complex to implement. I use Django Waffle for nearly every project involving feature flipping.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Conductrics
  • Positive rev impact
Read full review
Open Source
  • Easy to show clients different feature options without rewriting the whole codebase
  • Faster feedback loops during testing
  • Good for synchronizing team effort across the codebase
Read full review
ScreenShots