Covail vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator vs. VMware Cloud Foundation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Covail
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation is a hybrid cloud platform for managing VMs and orchestrating containers, built on full-stack hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) technology. With a single architecture that is desribed by the vendor as easy to deploy, VMware Cloud Foundation aims to enable consistent, secure infrastructure and operations across private and public cloud.N/A
Pricing
CovailTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVMware Cloud Foundation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CovailTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVMware Cloud Foundation
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CovailTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVMware Cloud Foundation
Considered Multiple Products
Covail

No answer on this topic

Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
This can be particularly beneficial for organizations with large and complex networks, as it simplifies the management and monitoring process. Trellix ePOoffers a range of customization options.. It allowing IT teams to tailor the solution to meet their specific needs.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
If you are using Microsoft Services or newer, cloud ones, it can be worth [it] to try their services but it may be very expensive because of the licensing thing and here Microsoft is very tricky and very difficult to decide the right one.
MalwareBytes is good product and adds …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Trend micro-endpoint management, Symantec/Norton AV
Compared to these, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator provides a much more robust and extensible all-around deployment and ongoing management solution.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
We selected McAfee EPO partly because we were already using McAfee VSE, but mostly because there are very few other AV management packages out there that offer the same level of enterprise management tools. That's where it really shines - deployment and management of AV in a …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
The price and the licensing options are very good. We were able to negotiate our pricing with plenty of flexibility ePO is one of the best administration console in the security world. Capability of deep customization are one of the biggest advantage. Ability to run PDF …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I think McAfee is a strong competitor and holds up well when compared to other software of its kind. If McAfee antivirus is already being used then it makes sense to go with this product to add another layer of management to the network.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee plays well in not only scanning the endpoint machines like the data which is shared through disks or pen drive but it also helps in internet security. With its wide range threat source it blocks users entering into malicious sites and also blocks suspicious things which …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Other products that were reviewed were Symantec's DLP and Forcepoint. The reason we ultimately went the ePolicy Orchestrator route was that we owned other McAfee products and the logic way to bring them together and to gain the maximum information was to bin them together with …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
We have not evaluated any other products in a very long time because moving to another AV product suite would be a very costly and long process. Another AV product would have to provide a very large cost reduction, performance improvements and unknown threat finding. We …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

We were using Vipre Anti-virus for years and switched to McAfee. We gained better insight into our environment. Management felt more secure knowing that at any moment we could bring up reports into what was going on in our environment.

McAfee ePO was able to give us time back …

VMware Cloud Foundation
Chose VMware Cloud Foundation
Although the public Cloud Model follows Opex Costing Model, it actually leads to very high costs also, the infra model in my organization is not suited for a Public Cloud Model. Hence We decided on an On-Premise Model, and the best suited was VMware Cloud Foundation, which is a …
Features
CovailTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVMware Cloud Foundation
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Covail
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.6
Ratings
19% below category average
VMware Cloud Foundation
-
Ratings
Network Analytics00 Ratings5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Covail
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.0
Ratings
31% below category average
VMware Cloud Foundation
-
Ratings
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CovailTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVMware Cloud Foundation
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
StarWind HCA
StarWind HCA
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
StarWind HCA
StarWind HCA
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CovailTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVMware Cloud Foundation
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CovailTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVMware Cloud Foundation
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
McAffee ePolicy Orchestrator is very well suited in large environments. You can load your updates to the repository and deploy them to every node on your network. It has great reporting and auditing features. You can control your users and groups all from the System Tree. DLP is great for USB devices. You can restrict all the ports on a computer and open them up for a limited time to plug in a device. EPO is to bulky for small networks.
Read full review
It is best suited for an on-premise cloud solution where customer can shift their entire production environment. Also, the customer has a preference for a Homogenous Infrastructure Environment where budget is not a challenge. It is not at all suited for a Heterogenous Environment, e.g., a Public cloud where integration becomes a huge issue, also in SMB sections where budget is challenging.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Applies the policy settings for the selected group
  • Keeps the hosts updated well, in general
  • Allows update of available software from within the management console
  • Assigns and runs ongoing tasks with little need for intervention
  • Provides quick high-level view of systems
Read full review
  • Cloud enabled Solution.
  • Support Container based Apps.
  • Cost efficient.
  • Supports both Public and Private Environments.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
  • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
  • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
Read full review
  • The Deployment is complex.
  • Recommended Number of Physical Nodes is three or more; with less than 3 Nodes, it becomes difficult to install V-SAN.
  • Need for better integration. If we go on the public cloud, it is a huge challenge while integrate with an open source platform.
  • Cost can be marginally reduced. SMB segments still prefer a separate license instead of VCF, or they postpone their purchase plans.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data loss prevention, encryption, anti-virus and other functionality and the excel on each of those points equally.
Read full review
Although the public Cloud Model follows Opex Costing Model, it actually leads to very high costs also, the infra model in my organization is not suited for a Public Cloud Model. Hence We decided on an On-Premise Model, and the best suited was VMware Cloud Foundation, which is a complete Software-Defined Scale-Out Architecture. I also prefer a Homogenous environment; i.e, support and services from a Single OEM, so that I Can get faster resolutions to my tickets raised.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • As with most things the price of products goes up and more-so if your business is growing.
  • We've been able to provide auditors with tangible evidence that our network is protected because of the reporting McAfee ePO provides. Auditors like McAfee because it's been around almost forever and is a mature product.
  • Being a mature product, though, it's very much set in the way it does things and as such there's not a whole lot of innovation.
Read full review
  • My organization has a size of 1300+ employees, using multiple applications and an exchange mail server that is hosted on On-Premise Cloud, hence scalability has not been a challenge.
  • Having hosted my Production environment and Mail exchange Server on VCF, there has been optimum resource utilization with very little scope downtime. Hence have been able to save a lot of funds on Hardware resources.
  • Due to the size of my organization and due the data load, I have been able to save on Resource Utilization and Organization Funds
Read full review
ScreenShots