Covetrus Pulse vs. ezyVet

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Covetrus Pulse
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Covetrus Pulse is a cloud-based veterinary management system, featuring an online pharmacy, patient communications with reminders and messaging, a practice whiteboard, Covetrus Payment Processing, and care plan management.
$0
per month
ezyVet
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
ezyVet is a cloud based VPM solution for Veterinary Practices worldwide.
$199
per month one user
Pricing
Covetrus PulseezyVet
Editions & Modules
N/A
$0
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Covetrus PulseezyVet
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Pricing based on sliding scales of users.
More Pricing Information
User Ratings
Covetrus PulseezyVet
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Covetrus PulseezyVet
Likelihood to Recommend
Covetrus
No answers on this topic
ezyVet
It is particularly good for practices with multiple veterinarians as it allows for easy collaboration and communication among team members. The comprehensive medical record-keeping system, appointment scheduling tools, and inventory management features make it easy to manage a busy practice when a case can require ongoing management between multiple vets. Conversely, less tech-savvy users will probably find that the software has a steep learning curve. It will typically require someone who is already well-versed in the software to teach the other employees in the clinic.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Covetrus
No answers on this topic
ezyVet
In RxWorks and Clinic-ware, only one user can access a record at any particular time. RxWorks has very inefficient and over-complicated menu that requires many clicks to navigate. They do not have a tab feature to allow users to juggle a few cases at a time, which is quite common in clinical practice. They have very limited custom templates. The visual layout of the software is relatively poor.
Read full review
ScreenShots