TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CyberArk Privileged Access Management vs. Netskope Private Access

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CyberArk Privileged Access Management

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACyberArk is a privileged account and access security suite issued by the company of the same name in Massachusetts . The Core Privileged Access Security Solution unifies Enterprise Password Vault, Privileged Session Manager and Privileged Threat Analytics to protect an organization’s most critical assets.N/A

    Netskope Private Access

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ANetskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
    Pricing
    CyberArk Privileged Access ManagementNetskope Private Access
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CyberArk Privileged Access ManagementNetskope Private Access
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsCyberArk offers a variety of Identity Security packages for different user types within an organization.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CyberArk Privileged Access ManagementNetskope Private Access
    Considered Both Products
    Cyberark
    No answer on this topic
    Netskope
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    CyberArk Privileged Access ManagementNetskope Private Access
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of CyberArk Privileged Access Management and Netskope Private Access
    Feature
    CyberArk Privileged Access Management
    -
    Ratings
    Netskope Private Access
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of CyberArk Privileged Access Management and Netskope Private Access
    Feature
    CyberArk Privileged Access Management
    -
    Ratings
    Netskope Private Access
    7.5
    3 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings7.53 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of CyberArk Privileged Access Management and Netskope Private Access
    Feature
    CyberArk Privileged Access Management
    -
    Ratings
    Netskope Private Access
    6.8
    4 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Network Analytics00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.64 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings6.04 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.34 Ratings
    Zero Trust Security
    Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of CyberArk Privileged Access Management and Netskope Private Access
    Feature
    CyberArk Privileged Access Management
    -
    Ratings
    Netskope Private Access
    7.8
    4 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Continuous Verification00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Network Flow Control00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
    Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
    Admin Access Control00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Network Data Encryption00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
    Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CyberArk Privileged Access ManagementNetskope Private Access
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Delinea Secret Server
    Score7.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
    Score10 out of 10
    Forescout Vistaro Platform
    Score6.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CyberArk Privileged Access ManagementNetskope Private Access
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.2
    (4 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CyberArk Privileged Access ManagementNetskope Private Access
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cyberark
    The system is great for enterprise or larger IT departments or teams where temporary or full access may be given using privileged IDs. Requirements for needing local admin access is also eliminated which can help with specific Windows workstation related tasks. It can be very useful when working with remote teams or contractors who may need temporary access to a system when required.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Netskope
    For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cyberark
    • Automatically discover new servers on the network and take control of the local admin password by vaulting it and ensuring nobody knows the password. A different password on every server.
    • Automatically roll the password in a configurable manner - after each use, after a certain period of time, etc.
    • Track and govern sensitive account usage by ensuring only properly authorized users can access the vault and obtain the credentials and then monitor usage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Netskope
    • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
    • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
    • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cyberark
    • GUI - right now everything is on one page/dashboard. Some level of folder/Safe type view would be great
    • More options when storing passwords - especially for network based passwords
    • Better integrations with vendors like Cisco so that admins dont need to really get the password from the vault (think Last Pass type add on)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Netskope
    • When a blocking alert pops up, the user could click to request it be enabled, making it easier to create the policy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Cyberark
    No answers on this topic
    Netskope
    We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cyberark
    It’s very usable once the complexity of deployment has completed. It is a useful tool that is easy to learn and the user interface is laid out well. It works with SSO for our organization which makes secure login very fast as well. It works well across our need of on premises systems and cloud very quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Netskope
    As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cyberark
    I've been an engineer and architect in the Identity space for many years and CyberArk is the #1 tool I've found to help me secure accounts and credentials. I've architected CyberArk and built the implementation from the ground up twice in previous roles and found it here upon my arrival at my current job. I wouldn't want to have to live without it as it helps me sleep at night
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Netskope
    The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Cyberark
    No answers on this topic
    Netskope
    The process was smooth and well managed.
    There was probably good technical coordination and support.
    There were only minor details that could be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cyberark
    These other vendors have most of the safe features, but there were some things that I think CyberArk performed better while evaluating the other solutions. AWS secret manager was not available in one of the products and this was definitely needed in my environment. Also, bulk loading of accounts had a lot more flexibility in CyberArk than the other solutions. They offer both API and GUI options where the other vendors may not offer both.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Netskope
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cyberark
    • Decreased the probability of an external cyber attack to privileged accounts..
    • Management can control privileged account life cycle management more effectively
    • Recording privileged sessions allows our organization to play back exactly the point of a breach or malicious behavior
    • Automated system to manage and verify passwords, as privileged accounts are constantly created and deleted
    • Automatic PWD change functionality will substantially decrease probability of PWD theft or misuse.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Netskope
    • Re-authentication improves the security.
    • Application access is more stable.
    • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    CyberArk Privileged Access Management Screenshots

    Screenshot of ISPSSScreenshot of Privilege CloudScreenshot of Identity Security IntelligenceScreenshot of Identity Security Intelligence