CyberArk Privileged Access Management vs. Netskope Private Access
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CyberArk Privileged Access Management | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | CyberArk is a privileged account and access security suite issued by the company of the same name in Massachusetts . The Core Privileged Access Security Solution unifies Enterprise Password Vault, Privileged Session Manager and Privileged Threat Analytics to protect an organization’s most critical assets. | N/A |
Netskope Private Access | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications. | N/A |
| CyberArk Privileged Access Management | Netskope Private Access | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | CyberArk offers a variety of Identity Security packages for different user types within an organization. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| CyberArk Privileged Access Management | Netskope Private Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
83% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
86% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| CyberArk Privileged Access Management | Netskope Private Access | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zero Trust Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CyberArk Privileged Access Management | Netskope Private Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Delinea Secret Server Score7.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score10 out of 10 | Forescout Vistaro Platform Score6.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| CyberArk Privileged Access Management | Netskope Private Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.0 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 7.2 | 5.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| CyberArk Privileged Access Management | Netskope Private Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| Incentivized |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | CyberArk Privileged Access Management Screenshots |






