TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cyberark Secrets Manager vs. Google Cloud Identity

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cyberark Secrets Manager

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution.N/A

    Google Cloud Identity

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Identity is a unified identity, access, app, and endpoint management (IAM/EMM) platform that gives users access to apps with single sign-on, provides multi-factor authentication to protect users and company data, and enforces policies for personal and corporate devices and endpoints.N/A
    Pricing
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Identity
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Identity
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Identity
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of Cyberark Secrets Manager and Google Cloud Identity
    Feature
    Cyberark Secrets Manager
    -
    Ratings
    Google Cloud Identity
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    9% above category average
    ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Identity
    Small Businesses
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    JumpCloud
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Identity
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Identity
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cyberark
    Cyberark Conjur is well-suited and includes the following: > Securing access to sensitive data in multi-cloud environments. > Providing secure access to secrets and credentials for 3rd party services and applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    For example, if the system you are building is a general application service that does not primarily focus on ID management, it would be wise to use a service like Google's rather than developing your own IDaaS. While there may be cases where an IDaaS other than Google's is acceptable, Google is likely one of the best solutions when considering user recognition and ease of use. On the other hand, Gmail addresses are commonly used for other purposes, and users may not pay much attention to password management, so you should avoid using them for systems that require security. To strengthen security, you should consider making multi-factor authentication mandatory, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cyberark
    • Provide allow-list
    • verifying authority
    • validate access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Two-factor authentication available.
    • The Google authentication method is familiar to many users.
    • It is expected that it will also support authentication methods that will become common in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cyberark
    • Searching containers can be difficult if you're not sure which you're looking for.
    • Initial authorization can be slow, specifically if the first instance failed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • This time, I investigated it in advance, and it worked as expected, so I don't have any specific ideas for improvement.
    • Additionally, if we were using another IDAAS, it would have been beneficial to have knowledge on how to integrate it with Google tools, along with some relevant case studies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cyberark
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    I chose Google because I thought it would be the best fit, but I didn't fully consider other cloud platforms (Azure, AWS, etc.), so I rated it 8. We assume that current Japanese users are familiar with Google, because we feel that there are far more people with Google email addresses than those with IDs on other cloud services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cyberark
    Cyberark Conjur has been a great asset to our company as it is a one stop shop that holds individuals, teams, departments, and the entire company accountable for the safety network. Not only do you have to be authorized to access Cyberark Conjuryou have to reauthorize to open, copy, or see individual passwords or accounts leaving a cyber trace of all your actions. There's no way to accidently get into something you're not supposed to be in.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    We adopted Google Cloud Identity as an additional feature because it allowed us to integrate with it using multi-factor authentication. The IBM Cloud platform remains valid, and we have no plans to discontinue its use for identity management. From the user's perspective, we simply added more authentication options. This also ensures we are prepared for future use when multi-factor authentication becomes available for user apps on the IBM Cloud.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cyberark
    • Before Cyberark we put passwords in a spread sheet - leaving exposure to theft.
    • Gives security compliance to our company
    • Keeps company and teams secure and safe.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • From a business perspective, there were two steps.
    • First, we switched from our in-house ID management system to a cloud service. This allowed us to focus our development resources on application development.
    • At the same time, we were able to localize the handling of personal information, which resulted in increased efficiency in management aspects, including handling external inquiries, and in the development of encryption.
    • The second step was adding Google Cloud Identity as an option.
    • This allows more users to easily use our services. It can be said that this has improved user convenience.
    • I expect Google to accommodate future changes in authentication requirements, such as biometric authentication.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots

    Screenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UI