TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cyberark Secrets Manager vs. Google Cloud Key Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cyberark Secrets Manager

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution.N/A

    Google Cloud Key Management

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Key Management allows users to manage encryption keys on Google Cloud.N/A
    Pricing
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Key Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Key Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Key Management
    Small Businesses
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Key Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerGoogle Cloud Key Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cyberark
    Cyberark Conjur is well-suited and includes the following: > Securing access to sensitive data in multi-cloud environments. > Providing secure access to secrets and credentials for 3rd party services and applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Use for most types of cloud SQL services. Excellent modern-day encryption technologies. If a customer wants to manage their keys then Google Cloud Platform is well suited for those people if it matters. Able to divide workloads and pipelines. Customer managed encryption keys support for Data fusion, Data Proc, Cloud SQL, and GKE. We use Cloud EKM: key use operations $0.03 per 10,000 operations for our day to day operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cyberark
    • Provide allow-list
    • verifying authority
    • validate access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Option for Customer-Managed Encryption keys for Cloud which very [few] providers do.
    • Option to enhance security via Hardware Security Modules.
    • Easy control panel and CLI.
    • Unified commands to approve or deny key requests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cyberark
    • Searching containers can be difficult if you're not sure which you're looking for.
    • Initial authorization can be slow, specifically if the first instance failed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • They removed the option for RSA128 bit security so yeah if it matters it a bummer.
    • Pipelines are limited and very [few] for the amount you pay.
    • General usability and Rapid CI/CD.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cyberark
    Cyberark Conjur has been a great asset to our company as it is a one stop shop that holds individuals, teams, departments, and the entire company accountable for the safety network. Not only do you have to be authorized to access Cyberark Conjuryou have to reauthorize to open, copy, or see individual passwords or accounts leaving a cyber trace of all your actions. There's no way to accidently get into something you're not supposed to be in.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    The UI / UX, first of all, is night and day difference. The main attraction after the services were this: It's user friendly. It welcomes new users and properly guides them on what to do and what you can expect. Honestly, I had a very bad experience with Microsoft Azure in 2018, so I think the Google Cloud Key Management service is best for me for now and I may give the new Azure a try later.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cyberark
    • Before Cyberark we put passwords in a spread sheet - leaving exposure to theft.
    • Gives security compliance to our company
    • Keeps company and teams secure and safe.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • There is no Return of investment in our operations as we use it for KMS.
    • The only ROI is that we have a piece of mind while our data is handled by Google.
    • Our main objective is being fulfilled and the staff as well as customer are happy.
    • Value for money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots

    Screenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UI