TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cyberark Secrets Manager

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution.N/A

    Fortify by OpenText

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AAn AppSec solution formerly from Micro Focus, spanning SCA, SAST and DAST that supports the breadth and management of any application portfolio, used to secure code. Features API discovery and testing for any application, throughout the software lifecycle.N/A
    Pricing
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerFortify by OpenText
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerFortify by OpenText
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerFortify by OpenText
    Considered Both Products
    Cyberark
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerFortify by OpenText
    Small Businesses
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    GitLab
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerFortify by OpenText
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cyberark Secrets ManagerFortify by OpenText
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cyberark
    Cyberark Conjur is well-suited and includes the following: > Securing access to sensitive data in multi-cloud environments. > Providing secure access to secrets and credentials for 3rd party services and applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    It is best suited for runtime application security scanning and very useful for automation. You can seemlessly integrate with pipeline for dynamic scans. Cloud based apps can also be scanned for vulnerabilities, cross site scripting attacks. Basically all OWASP TOP 10. It is less appropriate to use if you have serverless architecture
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cyberark
    • Provide allow-list
    • verifying authority
    • validate access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • DAST Scanning
    • API Scanning
    • Less detection of false positive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cyberark
    • Searching containers can be difficult if you're not sure which you're looking for.
    • Initial authorization can be slow, specifically if the first instance failed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Reporting could be better
    • Can be an involved setup if your organization is not using common build tools
    • Users get spammed with a lot of email updates from the service
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Cyberark
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Since every firm needs to perform static code analysis on their applications, I believe Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect would work well for them (they also offer dynamic scanning, although I haven't used it myself). Different static analysis tools scan code in different ways, and Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect asks you to submit a complete build of the application along with debugging files. Depending on how your company builds its apps, this requirement may be simple or challenging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cyberark
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    It is a cloud-based platform which can provide us a very useful and unique features like Application Assessment, Scans, Vulnerability Test, Comprehensive Reporting, Monitoring, etc. Fortify by Open Text is also outstanding in various parameters for the support and integration and it is highly adaptable in various DevOps Program where you need secure app testing with all given features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cyberark
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Always receive excellent support from the vendor. No issues there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cyberark
    Cyberark Conjur has been a great asset to our company as it is a one stop shop that holds individuals, teams, departments, and the entire company accountable for the safety network. Not only do you have to be authorized to access Cyberark Conjuryou have to reauthorize to open, copy, or see individual passwords or accounts leaving a cyber trace of all your actions. There's no way to accidently get into something you're not supposed to be in.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Fortify Application Defender is a little more timely and upfront with a lot of their information on cyber security. we like what they provide and how they communicate with our users. I think they have a good understanding and practice in their field. they seem best suited for us and the best fit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cyberark
    • Before Cyberark we put passwords in a spread sheet - leaving exposure to theft.
    • Gives security compliance to our company
    • Keeps company and teams secure and safe.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • DevSecOps helped in reducing efforts
    • License cost was less
    • We could roll out double the count of applications with implementation of WebInspect
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots

    Screenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UI