Cyberark Secrets Manager vs. Qualys VMDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cyberark Secrets Manager | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Cyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution. | N/A |
Qualys VMDR | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys VMDR 2.0 with TruRisk gives enterprises visibility and insight into cyber risk exposure with the goal of making it easy to prioritize vulnerabilities, assets, or groups of assets based on business risk. Security teams can take action to mitigate risk, helping the business measure its true risk, and track risk reduction over time. | N/A |
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Qualys VMDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Qualys VMDR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.9 | 9.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.4 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Configurability | - | 9.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 9.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Qualys VMDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots |






