The Swiss Army Knife of SecTools
July 31, 2025
The Swiss Army Knife of SecTools

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Qualys VMDR
The question to ask this is - what DOESN'T Qualys VMDR not do? Here are the widgets I have used: - Vuln scans of devices (server/PC/network) - Patch mgmt - Threat intel feed (with prioritization & use of MITRE) - Asset mgmt - PCI ASV onboard
Pros
- Seamless reporting across the different widgets (i.e. TruRisk)
- DEEP-DIVE into an asset's info/vulns
- Baked-in PCI ASV scans that a Qualys QSA can approve
Cons
- Add the container feature a little better
- Less of use API's & more connectors to keep it simple for onboarding data
- Agent for network devices - akin to what I get for server/desktop
- Taking the man-hours out & doing it with Qualys VMDR Vuln scans (i.e. CAPAT)
- Same for patch mgmt
- TruRisk gives super info on what your attack surface looks like
You can widgets galore from Qualys VMDR whereas with the others noted it's really vuln scanning.
Do you think Qualys VMDR delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Qualys VMDR's feature set?
Yes
Did Qualys VMDR live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Qualys VMDR go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Qualys VMDR again?
No
Qualys VMDR Feature Ratings
Using Qualys VMDR
4 - These are all IT - either security/compliance (all functions of Qualys VMDR) or IT INFR (vuln scan reports and/or patching)
1 - I own the service outright & manage it entirely (i.e. initial configuration, connections/integrations, asset discovery, etc).
- Vuln mgmt - previously there was nothing done
- Patching - having it done by same app as vuln scans is great
- TruRisk - gives a 30K-foot view of risk posed by all assets onboarded
- Threat Intel & MITRE
- DEV crew gets reports of vulns that exist (they had no clue prior)
- CTO gets to see the TruRisk reports
- IT sees whatever assets they are curious about in DETAIL
- Containers
- Adding network devices via the appliance (virtual for GCP)
- Anticipated future integrations
Evaluating Qualys VMDR and Competitors
- Integration with Other Systems
The sheer amount of integrations - especially as companies move towards AWS/GCP/Azure, etc. - makes for very simple admin. It takes (literally) a few minutes to set up one of the connectors to get robust information.
Would not change a thing. I use a "scorecard" to compare/contrast common features across vendors (i.e. feature gets weighted & scored 1-10; I also have 2-3 ITers do their own grading). Qualys VMDR was the clear winner.
Qualys VMDR Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was a minor issue with the implementation - Outside of alerting need-to-know staff about the install of agents or integrations, no stress. Agents are HARMLESS & integrations did not result in outage
Qualys VMDR Training
- No Training
yes - interface is pretty intuitive
Configuring Qualys VMDR
I learn by viewing
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
Qualys VMDR Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed Immediate help available Quick Initial Response | None |
The cost - most SMB's are in the same boat. You get the minimum & then have to live with the headache of not getting a resolution quickly.
Using Qualys VMDR
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Convenient Feel confident using | Difficult to use |
- Asset discovery
- Vuln reports
- Patching
Yes, but I don't use it
Qualys VMDR Reliability
Integrating Qualys VMDR
- GCP
- AWS
Not difficult at all
- File import/export
- API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
If you are not an expert with API's consult ChatGPT or other AI to help write them :-)
Relationship with Qualys
Nothing outside the usual
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation