Cyberark Secrets Manager vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cyberark Secrets Manager | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Cyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution. | N/A |
Veracode | Score8.5 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 128 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 90 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Happy with the feature set 132 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 76 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Implementation went as expected 101 Answers | |
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | GitLab Score8.9 out of 10 | Checkmarx Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.3 |
| Usability | - | 5.5 |
| Availability | - | 7.3 |
| Performance | - | 2.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.5 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.4 |
| Product Scalability | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| Cyberark Secrets Manager | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots | Veracode Screenshots |











