CyberBattleSim vs. GNS3

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CyberBattleSim
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
CyberBattleSim, released by Microsoft 365 Defender Research, is an open source attack toolkit that enables network simulation for researches to observe how their networks fare against attack from adversaries.N/A
GNS3
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
GNS3 is an open source software which visualizes, plans, tests and troubleshoost network environments across any vendor platform at scale - without the need to directly interact with the network hardware.N/A
Pricing
CyberBattleSimGNS3
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CyberBattleSimGNS3
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—GNS3 is a free open source software.
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
CyberBattleSimGNS3
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
PRTG
PRTG
Score 8.7 out of 10
PRTG
PRTG
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
PRTG
PRTG
Score 8.7 out of 10
PRTG
PRTG
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CyberBattleSimGNS3
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CyberBattleSimGNS3
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Cyberbattle SIm is actually a simulation application with the implementation of Python Based open AI to implement automated cyber agents and to deploy them on stimulating environments and networks with vulnerabilities and attack vectors to analyze and implement the learnings.
Read full review
GNS3
If you want to design a network that contains devices from different vendors and you want to implement and monitor this network and make sure of the stability of this network before actually implementing it physically, then this is the right program. It allows you to design a complete network with different components and from different vendors with the possibility of integrating various devices and also linking them with network monitoring programs.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Python Based open AI.
  • Uses reinforcement Algorithms for Training Purpose to Agents.
  • Simulation environment sets different for Attacker and Defender.
Read full review
GNS3
  • The possibility of applying integrated labs that simulate reality by more than 90%.
  • It enables the addition of different network devices from all vendors with the possibility of integration between them.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Needs to create various nodes on the network and have to indicate that services are running, it might be good if automated.
  • I think everything is perfect, teaches us a lot.
Read full review
GNS3
  • In my opinion, the program consumes a lot of device resources, especially when using the iOS version.
  • The program does not contain network devices, so you need to search for the network devices that you need and add them manually.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
As compared to the battles with AttackIQ both applications are stable and stimulate the work given, However, while using the attackIQ the architect can automate the testing process and engineering team and fill the gaps. And it offers robust security through continuous, automated security control validation.
Read full review
GNS3
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Nice Implication for learning.
  • Open source application so no Investment is applicable.
  • Helps to understand and analyse the networks security for the device.
  • Trigger alerts in XDr or SIEM systems.
Read full review
GNS3
  • Reducing spending on physical equipment
  • Improving the quality of output work
  • Developing the efficiency of the work team
Read full review
ScreenShots