TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Google Cloud IoT

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cybereason Defense Platform

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ACybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…N/A

    Google Cloud IoT

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AThe Google Cloud IoT Core is a fully managed service that allows you to easily and securely connect, manage, and ingest data from millions of globally dispersed devices. Cloud IoT Core, in combination with other services on Cloud IoT platform, provides a complete solution for collecting, processing, analyzing, and visualizing IoT data in real time to support improved operational efficiency.N/A
    Pricing
    Cybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Cloud IoT
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Cloud IoT
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Cloud IoT
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Cybereason Defense Platform and Google Cloud IoT
    Feature
    Cybereason Defense Platform
    9.1
    2 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Google Cloud IoT
    -
    Ratings
    Anti-Exploit Technology8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Management9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Infection Remediation10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Malware Detection10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internet of Things
    Comparison of Internet of Things features of Cybereason Defense Platform and Google Cloud IoT
    Feature
    Cybereason Defense Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Google Cloud IoT
    6.9
    2 Ratings
    14% below category average
    IoT Device Management00 Ratings5.22 Ratings
    Device Security00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    IoT Data Management00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    IoT Analytics00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    IoT Integration00 Ratings5.42 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Cloud IoT
    Small Businesses
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    AWS IoT Core
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    AWS IoT Core
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Cloud IoT
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (2 ratings)
    6.3
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cybereason Defense PlatformGoogle Cloud IoT
    Likelihood to Recommend
    LevelBlue
    I'd recommend Cybereason due to it's efficacy, low TCO, low false/positive rate. The product was easy to implement and maintain. One of the major advantages of using Cybereason is that it requires minimal training for level 1 users to use the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    I consider myself very techy and found Google Cloud IoT platform very challenging to manage. The lack of tutorials and discussions to understand how each section works is very challenging. I specifically made a connection after several hours to Google Nest to third-party integration, Home Assistant. Shortly after Google Cloud upgraded to a new version breaking the connection. This was extremely frustrating. No service should take several hours to figure out, in my opinion, if it does, the platform is doing a poor job of making it easy. I'm personally very discouraged any time I ever have to use this platform. It's very hard to find answers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    LevelBlue
    • EDR
    • Forensics
    • Mitigation
    • Response
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Integration with different brands of microcontrollers including the one currently used by Espresiff.
    • The platform is very robust and secure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    LevelBlue
    • Slow support
    • Bugs on their interface
    • Log extraction
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Not beginner friendly.
    • Needs more tutorials and walk throughs on how to get started.
    • Very complicated and unless you know what you are doing you will be lost.
    • Lack of material found on how to do each section / services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    LevelBlue
    Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Although comparisons are hateful, even more so when we are talking about leading brands where the quality of their services are indisputable, the general environment of Google was more familiar to me since I use, for example, Google Firebase on a daily basis, where part of the concepts are similar, without Without a doubt, AWS services are excellent, but it was easier for me to go through the functions of Google Cloud IoT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    LevelBlue
    • Helps on threat hunting
    • MalOps is very good
    • When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • The amount of hours to get things integrated is negative.
    • The amount of hours researching how to get devices integrated is negative.
    • Overall the amount of time and effort getting things working has been a negative experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots