Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management

Cybereason Defense Platform

8 Reviews and Ratings

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management

6 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cybereason Defense Platform	Score9.1 out of 10	N/A	Cybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…	N/A
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management	Score9.7 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management is a service available on Microsoft's Azure, that provides insights into vulnerabilities, risks, and exposures for web-based resources. It defines an organization’s unique internet-exposed attack surface and discovers unknown resources to help users proactively manage security posture.	$0.01 per day per asset

Pricing

Cybereason Defense Platform

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Cybereason Defense Platform	Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Features

Cybereason Defense Platform

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Cybereason Defense Platform and Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Feature	Cybereason Defense Platform 9.1 2 Ratings 7% above category average	Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management - Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology	8.32 Ratings	00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.62 Ratings	00 Ratings
Centralized Management	9.62 Ratings	00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	6.01 Ratings	00 Ratings
Infection Remediation	10.02 Ratings	00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	10.01 Ratings	00 Ratings
Malware Detection	10.02 Ratings	00 Ratings

Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Cybereason Defense Platform and Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Feature	Cybereason Defense Platform - Ratings	Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management 9.7 1 Ratings 18% above category average
Network Analytics	00 Ratings	9.01 Ratings
Threat Recognition	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Threat Analysis	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting	00 Ratings	9.01 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings

Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Cybereason Defense Platform and Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Feature	Cybereason Defense Platform - Ratings	Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management 9.4 1 Ratings 12% above category average
IT Asset Realization	00 Ratings	8.01 Ratings
Authentication	00 Ratings	9.01 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Web Scanning	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cybereason Defense Platform	Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Small Businesses	SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10	Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10
Enterprises	ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10	Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cybereason Defense Platform	Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Likelihood to Recommend	8.7 (2 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cybereason Defense Platform	Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Likelihood to Recommend	LevelBlue I'd recommend Cybereason due to it's efficacy, low TCO, low false/positive rate. The product was easy to implement and maintain. One of the major advantages of using Cybereason is that it requires minimal training for level 1 users to use the tool. Incentivized Keith Barros Senior Director, Information Security Read full review	Microsoft Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management is particularly well-suited for discovering, inventorying, and continuously monitoring the external attack surface, especially in environments with heavy Microsoft adoption. It is less suitable as a standalone solution for internal scanning, real-time attack detection, automated remediation, or advanced application testing. Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management es especialmente adecuado para descubrir, inventariar y monitorear continuamente la superficie de ataque externa, sobre todo en entornos con fuerte adopción de Microsoft. Es menos adecuado como solución única para escaneo interno, detección de ataques en tiempo real, remediación automática o pruebas avanzadas de aplicaciones. Parts of this review were originally written in Spanish and have been translated into English using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured. Incentivized SARAI ZAMBRANO MORENO Process Engineer Read full review
Pros	LevelBlue EDR Forensics Mitigation Response Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review	Microsoft Lack of visibility of external assets Reduction of the risk of external attacks Falta de visibilidad de activos externos Reducción del riesgo de ataques externos Incentivized SARAI ZAMBRANO MORENO Process Engineer Read full review
Cons	LevelBlue Slow support Bugs on their interface Log extraction Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review	Microsoft Asset Attribution and Ownership Clarity Risk Prioritization and Business Context Noise and False Positives Incentivized SARAI ZAMBRANO MORENO Process Engineer Read full review
Usability	LevelBlue No answers on this topic	Microsoft We rate Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management’s overall usability as 10 out of 10 because it delivers a strong balance between depth of capability and ease of use, particularly within organizations already operating in the Microsoft security ecosystem. Incentivized SARAI ZAMBRANO MORENO Process Engineer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	LevelBlue Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use. Incentivized Keith Barros Senior Director, Information Security Read full review	Microsoft Because Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management is part of the broader Microsoft Defender family (including Defender XDR, Entra ID, Azure Security, Sentinel, etc.), it: Shares identity, endpoint, and threat context across tools Reduces the need for custom integrations or connectors Works in a “single pane of glass” experience for SOC analysts Why it matters: Organizations already invested in Microsoft security tools gain greater contextual insight and lower operational overhead. Incentivized SARAI ZAMBRANO MORENO Process Engineer Read full review
Return on Investment	LevelBlue Helps on threat hunting MalOps is very good When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review	Microsoft Reduced Business Risk from Unknown External Assets Operational Efficiency and Cost Avoidance Faster Risk Identification During Change Events Incentivized SARAI ZAMBRANO MORENO Process Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots