TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cybereason Defense Platform

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ACybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…N/A

    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. MobSF support mobile app binaries (APK, IPA & APPX) along with zipped source code and provides REST APIs for integration with CI/CD or DevSecOps pipeline. The Dynamic Analyzer helps you to perform runtime security assessment and interactive instrumented testing.N/A
    Pricing
    Cybereason Defense PlatformMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cybereason Defense PlatformMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cybereason Defense PlatformMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Cybereason Defense Platform and Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Feature
    Cybereason Defense Platform
    9.1
    2 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    -
    Ratings
    Anti-Exploit Technology8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Management9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Infection Remediation10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Malware Detection10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cybereason Defense PlatformMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Small Businesses
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cybereason Defense PlatformMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cybereason Defense PlatformMobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    LevelBlue
    I'd recommend Cybereason due to it's efficacy, low TCO, low false/positive rate. The product was easy to implement and maintain. One of the major advantages of using Cybereason is that it requires minimal training for level 1 users to use the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    LevelBlue
    • EDR
    • Forensics
    • Mitigation
    • Response
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Scan for vulnerabilities
    • Scan for bad coding
    • Give suggestions on fixes for security issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    LevelBlue
    • Slow support
    • Bugs on their interface
    • Log extraction
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • The UI is not that user friendly
    • The documentation could be easier to understand
    • An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    LevelBlue
    Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    LevelBlue
    • Helps on threat hunting
    • MalOps is very good
    • When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
    • We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
    • The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots