Cybereason Defense Platform vs. OpenText Threat Detection and Response
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cybereason Defense Platform | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Cybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all… | N/A |
OpenText Threat Detection and Response | Score7.4 out of 10 | N/A | A combined SIEM and SOAR, used to accelerate threat detection and response with holistic security analytics, native SOAR, and intelligent automation. | N/A |
| Cybereason Defense Platform | OpenText Threat Detection and Response | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cybereason Defense Platform | OpenText Threat Detection and Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 60% Would buy again 3 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Happy with the feature set 4 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Implementation went as expected 4 Answers | |
| Cybereason Defense Platform | OpenText Threat Detection and Response | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cybereason Defense Platform | OpenText Threat Detection and Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() IBM Security QRadar SIEM Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM) Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cybereason Defense Platform | OpenText Threat Detection and Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Cybereason Defense Platform | OpenText Threat Detection and Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |





