Cybereason Defense Platform vs. SUSE Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cybereason Defense Platform
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Cybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…N/A
SUSE Security
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SUSE® Security (formerly NeuVector) provides an end-to-end container security platform. This includes end-to-end vulnerability scanning and complete run-time protection for containers, pods and hosts.N/A
Pricing
Cybereason Defense PlatformSUSE Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cybereason Defense PlatformSUSE Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cybereason Defense PlatformSUSE Security
Considered Both Products
Cybereason Defense Platform
Chose Cybereason Defense Platform
Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.
Chose Cybereason Defense Platform
It doesn't rely on signatures, most parts of their detection are behavior-based, and their marketing says that they have the lowest false positive rate in the market. It composes our server and notebooks endpoint solutions to protect against external threats and block internal …
SUSE Security
Chose SUSE Security
SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig …
Features
Cybereason Defense PlatformSUSE Security
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cybereason Defense Platform
9.1
Ratings
6% above category average
SUSE Security
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Management9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Infection Remediation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware Detection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cybereason Defense PlatformSUSE Security
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cybereason Defense PlatformSUSE Security
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cybereason Defense PlatformSUSE Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Cybereason is good at detections and has some false positives, but when we need their support, it's too slow. My team used to test Cybereason, submitting lots of malware and threats, trying to find problems, and for research purposes. In my experience, every time we found a bug, their support team denied the problems and took lots of weeks to give some answer when we insisted.
Read full review
overall experience so far is good with product and its features.good to have such product in the IT industry to go for it when it come to kubernetes-native container security platform it have the ability to have deep visibility into your network which is the critical part of run-time container security.
Read full review
Pros
  • EDR
  • Threat hunting
  • anti-malware
  • collecting telemetry
Read full review
  • Scans containers software for known vulnerabilities
  • Denies command execution in containers
  • Prevents unwanted network connections from/to containers
Read full review
Cons
  • Slow support
  • Bugs on their interface
  • Log extraction
Read full review
  • I like everything about NeuVector. They are on the right development path.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.
Read full review
SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig does not have such ability. Sysdig is not an open-source solution, but SUSE NeuVector is.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Helps on threat hunting
  • MalOps is very good
  • When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond
Read full review
  • We went from being blind to what happens in the Kubernetes network to seeing everything and being able to control Kubernetes network communications.
  • Now we are able to detect vulnerable containers faster.
Read full review
ScreenShots