Cybereason Defense Platform vs. ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform

I'd recommend Cybereason due to it's efficacy, low TCO, low false/positive rate. The product was easy to implement and maintain. One of the major advantages of using Cybereason is that it requires minimal training for level 1 users to use the tool.

Incentivized

ThreatCure Guardian Care services enable us to block C&C connections from some of our infrastructure systems. They told us that they had seen lateral movements in the early stages, which may indicate a ransom attack. They later provided us with a comprehensive report detailing the threat actors who were utilizing an insider threat in this.

• EDR
• Forensics
• Mitigation
• Response

Incentivized

• Indepth knowledge of our infrastructure
• Complete Threat Landscape view
• Early detection of threats

• Slow support
• Bugs on their interface
• Log extraction

Incentivized

• Would suggest ThreatCure red-teaming services.

Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.

Incentivized

While some items offer perfect sight, others fall short in other respects. The ThreatCure ShieldOps platform provides our management and incident response team with a 360-degree perspective. This facilitates quicker decision-making for the future. Furthermore, ThreatCure has an opex model, but other suppliers require significant Capex investments, which is an added advantage of SMB organization like us.

• Helps on threat hunting
• MalOps is very good
• When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond

Incentivized

• Now with lesser opex we are getting complete visibility.
• Now would like to acquire Threat Cure Guardian Care Services