Cycle vs. GoCD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cycle
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Cycle is a container orchestration platform. By simplifying the processes around container and infrastructure deployments, Cycle aims to enable developers to spend more time building and less time managing. With automatic platform updates, standardized deployments, a powerful API, and bottleneck crushing automation—the platform is designed to give organizations the capabilities of an elite DevOps team.
$0
GoCD
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
GoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A
Pricing
CycleGoCD
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CycleGoCD
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CycleGoCD
Best Alternatives
CycleGoCD
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CycleGoCD
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CycleGoCD
Likelihood to Recommend
Cycle
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
Previously, our team used Jenkins. However, since it's a shared deployment resource we don't have admin access. We tried GoCD as it's open source and we really like. We set up our deployment pipeline to run whenever codes are merged to master, run the unit test and revert back if it doesn't pass. Once it's deployed to the staging environment, we can simply do 1-click to deploy the appropriate version to production. We use this to deploy to an on-prem server and also AWS. Some deployment pipelines use custom Powershell script for.Net application, some others use Bash script to execute the docker push and cloud formation template to build elastic beanstalk.
Read full review
Pros
Cycle
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
  • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
  • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
  • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
Read full review
Cons
Cycle
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
  • UI can be improved
  • Location for settings can be re-arranged
  • API for setting up pipeline
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cycle
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
GoCD is easier to setup, but harder to customize at runtime. There's no way to trigger a pipeline with custom parameters.
Jenkins is more flexible at runtime. You can define multiple user-provided parameters so when user needs to trigger a build, there's a form for him/her to input the parameters.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cycle
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
  • ROI has been good since it's open source
  • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
  • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cycle Screenshots

Screenshot of