Depositphotos vs. iStock, from Getty Images

The site offers great deals on royalty-free high-quality images that are perfect for any type of project. I love how easy it is to search through the different categories to find exactly what I need. The site has an intuitive interface that makes it easy to navigate through the different categories or sort by date or price range.I also like how easy it is to download the files I need without having to worry about any additional fees or monthly subscriptions. I prefer the image download pack, where you pay once and then you can download selected images of your choosing from their library whenever you need them! This site has been very useful in helping me achieve my creative goals in terms of making my own films and creating beautiful graphic designs for websites or advertisements.

Incentivized

The best examples I have of my experience with iStock, from Getty Images comes from times I am creating prototypes or design concepts to show off a new content type or provide visual examples of how a page could look with the addition of good photography. My only downside is sometimes it can be a struggle to find organic looking stock images which is a key part of the brand identity we have.

Incentivized

• Search function is accurate and robust.
• Selection is different from the most used free image sites. The quality of the images is professional and high resolution.
• Their search filtering options are useful to match the type of image you are looking for. Let's you choose the type of person you want in the background, landscape versus isolation, orientation, etc.

Incentivized

• Variety
• Diversity
• Ease of use

Incentivized

• All in one subscription to download all types of assets.
• Missing a feature to create a collection to organize favorites.
• Lacking the option to download an entire collection of assets like for Summer, etc.

Incentivized

• Specificity
• Lots of odd photos
• DEI

Incentivized

Different focus. InVideo is for editing and creating videos

Incentivized

Compared to these others I feel that iStock has better variety and selection, better ease of use/interface/search features, fresher selection, and better pricing options. I don't like that Adobe Stock only has subscription options (last I checked) and I do not use them for that reason. I don't like the interface of Shutterstock as much and it's harder to download a test image to try out.

Incentivized

• Deposit photos allows me to have professional images on hand when I need them
• Being able to choose between a monthly subscription or pay for on demand images allows me to budget better. Depending on the need I have for images.
• The ROI has been good as I spend less time trying to find suitable images.

Incentivized

• Provided good stock imagery for really niche content areas, sometimes organic photography can be hard to replicate what stock does well
• Helped to quickly gain access to advertisement ready music tracks when the marketing team have been stuck for audio
• Allowed designers to provide high fidelity examples of brand styling or campaign ideas

Incentivized