Devart dotConnect vs. IBM Integration Bus

dotConnect for MySQL is suitable if you work with .net technologies and frameworks to develop applications but do not want to use SQL Server. This is a very common scenario and the Express edition can solve this problem if you need only basic connectivity features. If high performance is a crucial requirement for you, it may be a real concern. Maybe paid editions can deliver better performance, but you will need to deal with relevant costs.

Incentivized

Routing, protocol transformation, message transformation and service aggregation are very well performed by WebSphere Message Broker (WMB). It is not very suitable for integration with databases.

Incentivized

• Easy to use, client report-friendly
• Easy integration when accessing multiple SQL servers on the client side
• Pulls/connects easily from any application

Incentivized

• Graphical data mapper
• Support for different programming languages
• Integration with MQ
• Support for different parsers

Incentivized

• Better troubleshooting for errors in Visual Studio integration mode
• Improvements in performance
• Documentation could be better

Incentivized

• Logging
• Debugging
• Code quality tools
• Feature specific installation

Incentivized

We had been using an outsourced company for such projects until we decided to hire our own team and do all of this DB work in-house. So this was our first year of experience with this product. So far, we're very pleased, as are our clients.

Incentivized

Websphere message broker supports a lot more protocols than any other similar tool.

Incentivized

• Low-cost product for basic connectivity features
• Allows us to deliver applications for clients that requires MySQL as a database
• Allows us keep using our development tools and IDE due to integration capabilities (mainly Visual Studio)
• Easy to use

Incentivized

• It helped us in improving the speed to market for our services/APIs.
• Learning curve is quite long

Incentivized