DHTMLX vs. Pusher
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DHTMLX | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | DHTMLX delivers JavaScript/HTML5 libraries and UI widgets designed for building enterprise web apps of any complexity. With these out-of-the-box components, web developers can streamline their coding processes and integrate advanced functionality, to reduce development time. The actual DHTMLX product lineup comprises a range of web-based tools that can cover most of the contemporary business needs. DHTMLX | $799 one-time fee lowest cost single component |
Pusher | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | London-based Pusher supports mobile application development with pub/sub messaging and "presence channel" which supports discovery of live users of applications as well as messaging or chat room capabilities to applications, and finally location services as well (e.g. geolocation). | $49 per month |
| DHTMLX | Pusher | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | UI widgets are available standalone or "a la carte," or as part of bundles built around a theme (e.g. complete edition, scheduling components, planning components, etc.). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| DHTMLX | Pusher | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| DHTMLX | Pusher | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Syncfusion Essential Studio Score7.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Progress Telerik Score9.4 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Progress Telerik Score9.4 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| DHTMLX | Pusher | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Usability | 8.1 | - |
| DHTMLX | Pusher | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | DHTMLX Screenshots |







