Digital.ai TeamForge vs. Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

Digital.ai TeamForge

Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Digital.ai TeamForge	Score 7.0 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Digital.ai (formerly CollabNet) aims to help enterprises and government organizations deliver high-quality software at speed with TeamForge, its application lifecycle management suite. According to the vendor, Digital.ai offers innovative solutions, provides consulting and Agile training services, supports more than 10,000 customers with 6 million users in 100 countries, and has been recognized for 13 consecutive years as SD Times 100 “Best in Show” winner in the…	N/A
Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS	Score 10.0 out of 10	Small Businesses (1-50 employees)	Matrix Requirements helps medical device companies to manage their design and quality system, offering products that manage medical device requirements, specifications, risks and tests ensuring full traceability and ensuring compliance regulations for quality systems. MatrixALM can be used to manage all design inputs and outputs in one place and makes it visible for the whole team at any time supporting any workflow: Waterfall, V-Model or Agile.	$500 per month per user

Pricing

Digital.ai TeamForge

Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Matrix Essential: $500
per month per seat
Matrix Team: $750
per month per seat
Matrix Company: $1,145
per month per seat

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Digital.ai TeamForge	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

We also have an enterprise offering. Speak to our team to learn more!

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Digital.ai TeamForge	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

Best Alternatives
	Digital.ai TeamForge	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Small Businesses	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10	Polarion ALM Score 9.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Digital.ai TeamForge	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Digital.ai TeamForge	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Likelihood to Recommend	Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan) CollabNet TeamForge is more well-suited for technically knowledgeable users such as developers, systems analysts, QA but not for non-technical users due to the technical data used throughout the tool. CollabNet TeamForge is appropriate for most applications development. In any industry especially suited for high demand software delivery environments. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Matrix Requirements No answers on this topic
Pros	Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan) Code security. Code migration. Agile tie-in. Incentivized James Milholen Senior Continuous Integrations Specialist (DevOps) Read full review	Matrix Requirements No answers on this topic
Cons	Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan) I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks. I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer. I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Matrix Requirements No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan) They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge. Incentivized James Milholen Senior Continuous Integrations Specialist (DevOps) Read full review	Matrix Requirements No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan) CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience. JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Matrix Requirements No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan) Unfortunately, I do not have access to ROI information. Incentivized James Milholen Senior Continuous Integrations Specialist (DevOps) Read full review	Matrix Requirements No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Digital.ai TeamForge Screenshots