Digital.ai TeamForge vs. SiteVision

CollabNet TeamForge is more well-suited for technically knowledgeable users such as developers, systems analysts, QA but not for non-technical users due to the technical data used throughout the tool. CollabNet TeamForge is appropriate for most applications development. In any industry especially suited for high demand software delivery environments.

Incentivized

well suited scenarios are : 1. In terms of architectural context its well suited to know the exact location by 3D Model approach. 2. Its excellent to use in civil construction firms to get the exact distance management approach and to get the best design approach. Less appropriate: 1. For those projects which are not outside or in outdoors its less suited to use there. 2. AR technology +3D tech could be seen in the areas having great land coverage

Incentivized

• Code security.
• Code migration.
• Agile tie-in.

Incentivized

• Get the exact AR version of the project site
• Helps in distance management on the site by measuring the spatial points.
• Helps in power management too.

Incentivized

• I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks.
• I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer.
• I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes.

Incentivized

• cloud services could be improved much.
• accuracy could be enhanced for the hardware tools like GNSS
• The AR technology could be mixed with the other latest updates to make the system more efficient and light.

Incentivized

They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge.

Incentivized

CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think
CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience.
JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams.

Incentivized

1. Easy to use 2. Easy to accessible from play store 3. Clarity of the apps shown in the screen. 4. Help center is very helpful. 5. Accuracy is very good as compare to other apps. 6. Distance management and AR tech mix up is really appreciable. 7. Power management is nice add on feature

Incentivized

• Unfortunately, I do not have access to ROI information.

Incentivized

• got the clear contextual clarity of the site
• Exact augmented points are there so that spatial data could be more enhanced.
• power management is an excellent approach which has a greater impact on the project.

Incentivized