Dist vs. GoCD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Dist
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Dist provides Docker Container Registries and Maven Repositories with a focus on simplicity and reliability. Private repositories for internal development and deployment Protected and public repositories for software distribution Dist works with native tooling (Docker, k8s, Maven, Gradle, sbt, Leiningen, etc); no plugins to install, making it easy for your team and customers to use Dist is fully managed in the cloud, no installation or maintenance…
$39
per month
GoCD
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
GoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A
Pricing
DistGoCD
Editions & Modules
Core
$39
per month
Plus
$99
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DistGoCD
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsWe are more than happy to customize plans based on your needs, simply contact us at team@dist.cloud.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DistGoCD
Best Alternatives
DistGoCD
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DistGoCD
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
DistGoCD
Likelihood to Recommend
Dist
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
Previously, our team used Jenkins. However, since it's a shared deployment resource we don't have admin access. We tried GoCD as it's open source and we really like. We set up our deployment pipeline to run whenever codes are merged to master, run the unit test and revert back if it doesn't pass. Once it's deployed to the staging environment, we can simply do 1-click to deploy the appropriate version to production. We use this to deploy to an on-prem server and also AWS. Some deployment pipelines use custom Powershell script for.Net application, some others use Bash script to execute the docker push and cloud formation template to build elastic beanstalk.
Read full review
Pros
Dist
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
  • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
  • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
  • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
Read full review
Cons
Dist
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
  • UI can be improved
  • Location for settings can be re-arranged
  • API for setting up pipeline
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Dist
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
GoCD is easier to setup, but harder to customize at runtime. There's no way to trigger a pipeline with custom parameters.
Jenkins is more flexible at runtime. You can define multiple user-provided parameters so when user needs to trigger a build, there's a form for him/her to input the parameters.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Dist
No answers on this topic
ThoughtWorks
  • ROI has been good since it's open source
  • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
  • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
Read full review
ScreenShots