Docker vs. Google Artifact Registry (superseding Google Container Registry)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Docker | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Docker Enterprise was sold to Mirantis in 2019; that product is now sold as Mirantis Kubernetes Engine. But Docker now offers a 2-product suite that includes Docker Desktop, which they present as a fast way to containerize applications on a desktop; and, Docker Hub, a service for finding and sharing container images with a team and the Docker community, a repository of container images with an array of… | $5 per month |
Google Artifact Registry | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Google Artifact Registry is a managed service on Google Cloud for storing, managing, and distributing build artifacts and dependencies, including container images, language packages, and operating system (OS) packages. It succeeds Container Registry, which is now shut down. Writing images to Container Registry became unavailable on March 18, 2025. | N/A |
| Docker | Google Artifact Registry | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Docker | Google Artifact Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Docker | Google Artifact Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Docker Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | Docker Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | JFrog Artifactory Score8.1 out of 10 | Docker Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Docker | Google Artifact Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Availability | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | 8.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | - |
| Docker | Google Artifact Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |

