EasyQA vs. Zephyr Scale

The complexity of the product is too high, so even changes to a single feature impact many other functionalities. Using EasyQA has helped us create multiple test cases where the feature may have its effects and test and track the progress on as many related functionalities as possible.

Incentivized

Jira and Confluence are widely implemented in organizations of various industries so incorporating Zephyr Scale is a very seamless method of adding scalable testing management. Testing visibility and end to end traceability is possible and integrates in Jira. Developers and engineers are able to take advantage of the built-in reports and statistics and even automate testing. The value is greatly reduced for organizations that do not already implement Jira and Confluence as the native integrated compatibility is much of the value

Incentivized

• Creation of test cases for new features
• Management of created bugs
• Bug tracking and analysis

Incentivized

• Scalable and compatible with Jira & Confluence
• Improves testing visibility, data analysis, collaboration with reports & gadgets
• Easy to retrospectively trace testing with change history

Incentivized

• In my experience, they provide poor support
• The application is still a bit buggy

Incentivized

• Not as valuable if not already using Jira or Confluence
• Can be overlooked if the user does not set automation
• Needs better first time tutorials

Incentivized

Zephyr scale is easier to work with and more seamlessly used because it is natively integrated with Jira and Confluence. TestRail cannot provide the same scalable experience and is rather dated and limited in capability. Developers rather use tools that are compatible with each other, and Zephyr scale offers that

Incentivized

• Dozens of added testing capability via integrated gadgets
• Reduced testing and tracking time
• Faster and clearer testing operations awareness

Incentivized