EclecticIQ Platform vs. Juniper SecIntel Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

ElecticIQ has an architecture where it usually needs decent computing power within the organisation. The central console along with the ELK servers and PostgreSQL sever needs their own space in a distributed setup. This could be a little too expensive for small-scale organisations. But for the organizations having mid to large-scale networks. EIQ is a decent solution to serve the purpose.

Incentivized

It is well suited in cases if you want good threat intelligence software that can collect data from multiple sources. A tool with threat logging and detection/enforcement capabilities that enable you to identify, monitor passively, and block known threats at the firewall. Although it is very costly compared to its competitors it is worth it in terms of the functionality it provides to organizations.

Incentivized

Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense.

Incentivized

• Effective correlation of IOCs
• Averaging out the Confidence Score based on different intel sources.
• Serves as an excellent liaison points between the Intels and SIEM/SOAR stack.

Incentivized

• Feeds on malicious IP, URLs and domains.
• Infected host and custom threat feed.
• Allows data from third party sources.

Incentivized

• Threat intelligence
• Emerging Threats
• Intelligence feeds

Incentivized

• Misses on a global search bar which can directly gives out the result like VirusTotal.
• The GUI could be more friendlier. Too many filters and graphs may overwhlem the user sometimes.
• The ElasticSearch(searching for IOC in the in-house EIQ database) is a little slow compared to its counterparts.

Incentivized

• Free trial / free version should be there.
• Licensing cost should be less.
• Customer support service can be improved.

Incentivized

• third party product integration
• simplicity of the managment console
• integration to cortex agents directly

Incentivized

The most important feature of EclecticIQ which gives it an edge compared to other TIPs is that it performs segregation of IOCs based on the relevance of it and the links that IOCs might have which other adversaries. The graphical format mapping where the user can easily figure out how the IOCs have connections to different binaries is another advantage. One can set the half-life time for an IOC which will reduce the confidence score as per one's need.

Incentivized

If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent.

Incentivized

• Positive: Effective usage of all the premium Intels in a uniform fashion. No need to log in to each tool time and again.
• Positive: SOC Analysts spends lesser time on the internet and the analysis for the IOCs with graphical format is fulfilled by EclecticIQ.
• Negative: Higher costs over the resource utilization in the initial setup.

Incentivized

• Increase in compliance with regulatory requirements.
• Increase in customers and clients trust.
• Overall organization security posture has been improved.

Incentivized

• Cheap for us
• Easy integration
• Easy management

Incentivized