Eclipse Mosquitto vs. IBM Confluent
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Eclipse Mosquitto | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices from low power single board computers to full servers. It is open source and free, dual-licensed under the Eclipse Public License 2.0 and the Eclipse Distribution License 1.0. | $0 |
IBM Confluent | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
| Eclipse Mosquitto | IBM Confluent | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Eclipse Mosquitto | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 88% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | |
| Eclipse Mosquitto | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Eclipse Mosquitto | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.6 |
| Usability | - | 7.4 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Eclipse Mosquitto | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |