Email on Acid vs. Mailtrap

Great for use during the QA process prior to launching new email marketing campaigns to identify inboxing issues, spam red flags, and inconsistent design across ESPs prior to sending. Not so great for creating emails - better suited for testing them as EOA doesn't integrate with marketing automation platforms, so you'd be doing double work.

Incentivized

As I said, Mailtrap is particularly well-suited for software development teams working on email functionality within their applications. All the automation and intuitive environment helped us create a workflow that's almost set and forget.

Incentivized

• Great intelligent HTML editor
• Great inbox preview rendering
• Excellent customer support

Incentivized

• Flexible for engineering teams. Mailtrap works well in environments where multiple developers are responsible for email functionality.
• We're on the Enterprise plan which allows for customizations for our needs. For example, we had a request not to record email bodies for privacy reasons, and Mailtrap enabled that pretty fast.
• The user experience is awesome. The platform is easy to use and the support team responds fast and helps us out with any questions.

Incentivized

• Poor interface via Blackbaud
• Speed
• Dark mode

Incentivized

• Inbox placement analysis - currently, Mailtrap does not offer inbox placement analysis. But their analytics dashboard compensates well for that.

Incentivized

Email on Acid has more features than Litmus. They offer more email clients to test on and during my time using both tools, had fewer clients that displayed as being down. This was a major time suck especially when testing for specific clients such as Microsoft Outlook.

Incentivized

sendgrid is powerful for email delivery, but Mailtrap's dedicated testing environment and focus on development teams made it the clear choice for our needs. Its ability to simulate various email scenarios without affecting real users is unmatched. Plus, their sending is reliable, regardless of your volume.

Incentivized

• It makes our quality assurance tests efficient
• Gives confidence to send strong deliverables to clients

Incentivized

• Efficiency - Made testing emails faster, so we can launch new features quicker.
• Reliability - Enhanced the reliability of our email notifications (transactional emails). It really improved our customer satisfaction.
• Cost-Effective - Avoided the need for multiple tools and saved us money by consolidating our email testing, sending, and management.

Incentivized