EMCO MSI Package Builder vs. F5 BIG-IQ Centralized Management

For large, complex software deployments that have a number of install scenarios and executables that interact with one another, EMCO MSI Builder is well-suited. It is able to track software installs, registry changes, file additions, and deletions, modifying shortcuts and anything else that would be needed to prepare big deployment projects for large organizations.

Incentivized

F5 BIG-IQ Centralized Management works perfectly in Software upgrades and simple daily changes. We are successfully using it to create and or delete objects. It doesn`t works well when we need reports. I usually have to create custom scripts to get a list of objects, for example. Performance is also something that could be improved in Big-IQ

Incentivized

• Capture Customizations to settings/registry.
• Track File movement and additions during install for specific uses.
• Capture file and system level changes for inclusion in deployment.

Incentivized

• Common system level changes like cipher suite customization, ssh protocol settings etc can be pushed to all F5 gear through one click of a button
• Enterprise standard templates for profiles/protocols etc., can be efficiently managed across F5 gear through a single interface

Incentivized

• Work on clearly defining functions on reboot.

Incentivized

• There a lack of the going forward to next
• The second site product does not do what we need and we are forced to write our own scripts
• Many of the alerting that was in enterprise management is no longer in F5 BIG-IQ Centralized Management

Incentivized

I feel pinning policies are killing you guys when it comes to being able to add multiple LTMs that have different naming conventions.

Incentivized

Support has always been quick to respond with additional information and clarification

Incentivized

Provides advanced functionality for the enterprise level software deployment analyst over and above the basic tools that Microsoft included with the original APP-v sequencing tool, allowing the analyst greater control over what is captured and how it is captured. This makes the impact of needing to change the deployment package easier to maintain and update

Incentivized

Of all the centralized Management platforms I have ever used, BIG-IQ is the worst. It constantly breaks and requires fixing in some way or another.

Incentivized

• It allows faster turnaround time for complex deployment projects.
• Easy to update existing deployment packages with changes.
• We must maintain the pristine virtual machine for usage.

Incentivized

• Cut costs by requiring less manual hours to manage F5 OS installations
• Great monitoring and alerting tool for general F5 gear health
• Provides critical information for capacity planning of the F5 resources

Incentivized