TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Engine Yard vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Engine Yard

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AEngine Yard is a platform-as-a-service solution allowing developers to plan, build, deploy, and manage applications in the cloud. Engine Yard also provides services for deployment, managing AWS, supporting databases, and microservices & container development.

    $800

    Per Month Per Cluster

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ARed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.N/A
    Pricing
    Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Editions & Modules
    Platform
    $800.00
    Per Month Per Cluster
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Engine Yard and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Feature
    Engine Yard
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Security and Isolation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Cluster Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Storage Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Discovery Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Engine Yard
    It is best for rapidly getting your application to the cloud without worrying about standing up cloud infrastructure
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Engine Yard
    • Quick deployments
    • Easily integrate your code from GitHub
    • Ability to recover site quickly to different zone when AWS has a widespread outage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
    • Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
    • Built-in Security & compliance.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Engine Yard
    • Embracing new Amazon Web Servicess(AWS) features
    • Security groups need more granularity
    • Audit trails of what happens by who in environment, especially when VM is deleted
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
    • Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
    • LCM of ACM itself.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Engine Yard
    Ease of use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Engine Yard
    More closely aligns to native AWS
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Engine Yard
    • Positive in the sense that we can deploy new applications quickly for MVP
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
    • Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
    • Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots