Engine Yard vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Engine Yard
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Engine Yard is a platform-as-a-service solution allowing developers to plan, build, deploy, and manage applications in the cloud. Engine Yard also provides services for deployment, managing AWS, supporting databases, and microservices & container development.
$800
Per Month Per Cluster
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.N/A
Pricing
Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Editions & Modules
Platform
$800.00
Per Month Per Cluster
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Features
Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Engine Yard
-
Ratings
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
8.4
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.4 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Engine YardRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
Engine Yard
It is best for rapidly getting your application to the cloud without worrying about standing up cloud infrastructure
Read full review
Red Hat
Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.
Read full review
Pros
Engine Yard
  • Quick deployments
  • Easily integrate your code from GitHub
  • Ability to recover site quickly to different zone when AWS has a widespread outage
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
  • Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
  • Built-in Security & compliance.
Read full review
Cons
Engine Yard
  • Embracing new Amazon Web Servicess(AWS) features
  • Security groups need more granularity
  • Audit trails of what happens by who in environment, especially when VM is deleted
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
  • Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
  • LCM of ACM itself.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Engine Yard
Ease of use
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Engine Yard
More closely aligns to native AWS
Read full review
Red Hat
I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Engine Yard
  • Positive in the sense that we can deploy new applications quickly for MVP
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
  • Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
  • Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.
Read full review
ScreenShots