Evidian Analytics and Intelligence allows a fine-grained auditing of IAM system, backed by strong analytic capabilities using different data sources, criteria and custom views. The trends of the Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) of a business allows users to detect atypical behaviors (e.g. repeated requests for exceptional rights for a user) and react accordingly.
N/A
Microsoft Security Copilot
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Security Copilot helps security and IT teams to protect organizations at the speed and scale of AI. It is available in a standalone experience or embedded into other Microsoft Security products.
Microsoft Security Copilot is more orientated towards the work I do and business I work for which is Security in Azure or Microsoft Products. Comparing the products has minor differences unless given explicit scenarios. In general use all of the products can fit a need …
while answers from ChatGPT can be better some times , having Microsoft Security Copilot integrated directly in your stack is something completely different , it has awareness of you environment , EDR and XDR , security incidents in Microsoft sentinel , your entry ID enivrnment …
My usage of other products is based on SIEM tools. So far, Microsoft Security Copilot is the only product I've seen that works across multiple technologies/products to provide full visibility into security tooling using AI. I know other vendors are working towards this, but …
These are all AI tools buy Copilot is integrated with the Microsoft stack so it is already part of the normal workflow. It is also easier to manage because of this.
I have used mostly ChatGPT and Microsoft Security Copilot. I feel that Microsoft Security Copilot is a little bit better when helping with Microsoft products. I think both products can give you what you want, but Microsoft Security Copilot seems to use a more streamlined …
Copilot is already integrated with and built for the Microsoft stack. It lives in it natively, versus integrating with a third-party. You always know where your data is stored and used. The HIPAA compliance aspect is a big factor to as some third parties will not sign a BAA …
I think we have other products that we have evaluated. Since it's confidential, I can't share it. One is brand for Microsoft and the second is ease of use.
I mostly use it because of the AI. Mitre is more manual process. It's a very old process. So definitely using AI for security is the reason why I went for this product and kind of augmenting my skills is the reason why I chose this.
To be honest, I'm only a user, so I don't see those edge cases where it doesn't work well. I only see it when it's working. If it's not working, I call IT support and go, "It's not working." And they figure out what's wrong. So, for the most part, does it work? For the most part, it works. Other than that, logging in is sometimes a little clunky, but to be honest, who knows whose fault that is. It could be who we're using for our internet.
They integrate very well, and they have a lot of options within each product. That's what they do well. They bring together the entire suite of tools, all of the edge. Each product does its thing very well, and to bring it all together utilizing AI, it's very difficult for us to understand what the paved path is to get from A to Z. And that's what they don't do so well.
The reason I said it was better was that when I ran the same query in other AI engines, like OpenAI, I still believe my Microsoft Security Copilot can be further trained to give better results than that. So I think that's something that should be an improvement.
We are not going to stop using M365 and our environment is large enough that there is not enough in-house expertise to handle all aspects of security, even with the help of a MSSP. Security Copilot helps us shore up the knowledge gap and keep our organization's security posture tight.
It is easily accessible and provides a similar Copilot interface as other Microsoft services. The natural language processing allows users to interact with it in plain language which greatly reduces the learning curve. Theoretically, even non-technical users within a company could utilize the product to get data for reporting or analysis.
Microsoft Security Copilot is more orientated towards the work I do and business I work for which is Security in Azure or Microsoft Products. Comparing the products has minor differences unless given explicit scenarios. In general use all of the products can fit a need but Microsoft Security Copilot suits mine in my security role the best.
So Microsoft Studio has really helped increase our productivity in a big way, from five hours down to five minutes or less, depending on the ask. And because we saw that type of performance increase and cut in the time it takes to answer a question, we could only assume that utilizing Microsoft Security Copilot would offer the same benefits. But as of right now, because of cost and not understanding what each agent is going to cost us, we have our hands tied at the moment because leadership, again, wants to understand if we enable this agent and we add the add-ons, how much is that going to cost?
The other downstream impact is that if we build the agents, regardless of cost right now, because we have 10,000 tokens that are free, if we build all that out, and then it comes time where it's just like because there's a window right now that we have till around June, until they'll start actually charging us.