Fastly Next-Gen WAF vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fastly Next-Gen WAF | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Fastly Secure (based on Signal Sciences, acquired December 2020), offers a WAF and RASP solution that protects over 34,000 applications and over a trillion production requests per month. Signal Sciences’ architecture is designed to provide organizations working in a modern development environment with comprehensive and scalable threat protection and security visibility. Additionally, Signal Sciences integrated BotSense service prevents bad bots from performing malicious actions against their… | N/A |
Veracode | Score8.5 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 131 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 93 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Happy with the feature set 135 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 79 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 87% Implementation went as expected 104 Answers | |
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF Score9.4 out of 10 | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF Score9.4 out of 10 | Checkmarx Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.3 |
| Usability | - | 5.5 |
| Availability | - | 7.3 |
| Performance | - | 2.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.5 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.4 |
| Product Scalability | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| Fastly Next-Gen WAF | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Veracode Screenshots |








