TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

FatPipe MPVPN vs. SonicWall VPN Clients

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FatPipe MPVPN

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AFatPipe MPVPN ffom FatPipe Networks in Salt Lake City aggregates two or more data lines of any type and in any combination to provide security, redundancy, and speed for VPNs. FatPipe MPVPN enables fault tolerance and reliability for VPN using technology to keep mission-critical VPNs up and running.N/A

    SonicWall VPN Clients

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AThe SonicWall VPN Clients present a number of options for secure private access to enterprise network assets.N/A
    Pricing
    FatPipe MPVPNSonicWall VPN Clients
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FatPipe MPVPNSonicWall VPN Clients
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    FatPipe MPVPNSonicWall VPN Clients
    Virtual Private Network
    Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of FatPipe MPVPN and SonicWall VPN Clients
    Feature
    FatPipe MPVPN
    -
    Ratings
    SonicWall VPN Clients
    9.7
    2 Ratings
    9% above category average
    AES 256-bit Encryption00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Kill Switch00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multi-Platform Support00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Split Tunneling00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    IP Address Masking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multiple Server Locations00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Automatic Wi-Fi Protection00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Simultaneous Connections00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    User Ratings
    FatPipe MPVPNSonicWall VPN Clients
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.8
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FatPipe MPVPNSonicWall VPN Clients
    Likelihood to Recommend
    FatPipe Networks
    If you need multiple ISPs for wan aggregation or site to site failover. This box can tolerate failures of ISPs and sites with less than 1-3 seconds of outage time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    It is well suited in places or scenarios where a VPN client is needed to be used either by IT staff or other employees. SonicWall's VPN Clients are very similar to VPN clients of other companies. SonicWall VPN Clients are meant to be used with SonicWall firewalls.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    FatPipe Networks
    • Load balancing of ISPs
    • Site to site failover
    • SmartDNS
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • Exceptional security
    • Relatively easy configuration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    FatPipe Networks
    • Could use a training manual.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • doesn't have ability to name specific IPs, which gets burdensome when you have 50+ sites you access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    FatPipe Networks
    No answers on this topic
    SonicWall
    Does not have a renewal that we pay for by itself. It comes with our firewalls, which we are going to renew.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    FatPipe Networks
    No answers on this topic
    SonicWall
    SonicWall VPN Clients work for the most part. The Global VPN client has had its issues over the years. Also, NetExtender VPN client has had its share of issues. It is nice that SonicWall VPN Clients has updated the GUI of the NetExtender client within the last year, which has made it easier for our users to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    FatPipe Networks
    No answers on this topic
    SonicWall
    Phone support has been very reliable and useful, but there have been times when better support documentation would have made that call unnecessary. I like to tackle problems internally if I can, as it tends to save time and usually money. The SonicWall VPN Clients system seems to be pretty locked down as far as being accessible to self-manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    FatPipe Networks
    Fatpipe invented SD-WAN over 25 years ago and has been leading the way. Other companies I think have just ridden their coattails.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    We started the process of vetting Norton VPN, but since it wasn't available from our preferred vendor, we ended up going with SonicWall VPN Clients by default.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    FatPipe Networks
    • We have lost ISPs without any business disconnections.
    • Business continuity at its best.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • Allows for remote work to boost employee productivity
    • Allows for IT to access large volumes of sites from a central location. We have about 50 buildings that I VPN into every so often for troubleshooting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots