Feature Toggle vs. Angular Feature Flags

It's helpful that the tool takes URL parameters into account but that requires the URL structure to be of desired quality, to begin with. This tool is best suited for those working off of solid foundation in terms of web presence

Incentivized

Feature Flags are well suited for apps which are being developed across numerous teams in order to extend and basically enable/disable whatever areas of the app you want. It's not really necessary for an individual developer or perhaps even a single team of developers, depending.

Incentivized

• Limit software options - prevents rework time
• Allows for beta testing - allows for better later buy-in

Incentivized

• Allows for easy configuration of what you may define as features
• Allows for a customization layer to utilize Feature Flags

Incentivized

• More help/how-to literate or use cases.
• Conditional logic could be improved.
• More dynamic interface.

Incentivized

• Would be nice if there were a built in route guard and more end to end solution out of the box I suppose

Incentivized

I'm not sure about the support ....we didn't use it.

Incentivized

Togglz has more detailed documentation and recurring updates. But the Togglz default setting to "HTTP" caused some glitches.

Incentivized

We still utilize Git as our source control system but Feature Flags allow us to use Git in a less complex and more efficient way for our development needs.

Incentivized

• The cost of a programmer is certainly a ticket to budget. Neg
• The cost savings of limiting operational database errors is certainly more positive than the negative just mentioned.

Incentivized

• I would say a large ROI considering the reduction in branching and merging we need to perform and also the ability to use common, up to date code across teams. There's a lot of shared code we make use of, particularly with identity and authentication and our entire identity platform which is essentially used by each feature.

Incentivized