Fetcher vs. Loxo Recruitment Platform

Fetcher is best suited to targeted roles with specific job titles, functional responsibilities, and other criteria (eg. years of experience, etc). It is less effective at sourcing for generalized titles, responsibilities, and overly broad roles.

Incentivized

[Loxo Recruitment Platform is well suited for] managing lots of candidates and clients[.] Identifying candidates if you did not have a subscription to LinkedIn [and] identifying candidate and contact information if you did not have Zoom Info[.]

Incentivized

• Email automation
• Identifying top talent
• Exporting candidates to our ATS

Incentivized

• Candidate and contact information
• Email campaigns

Incentivized

• Prefab email templates
• Dashboard

Incentivized

• Saving candidate searches
• Mobile application

Incentivized

[Loxo Recruitment Platform is] intuitive to learn and use[.] It would be better if you save searches, had mobile functionality, and had an easier to search the candidates with a NOT feature (not having specific attributes or an empty field)[.]

Incentivized

Timely, caring, and knowledgeable

Incentivized

Fetcher has been our #1 used tool on the Recruiting team over the last year. We have found significant value across the board compared to other tools we have tried.

Incentivized

Better ability to identify and communicate with candidates and clients[.] Unique ability to share search status with clients[.]

Incentivized

• Saved tens of thousands of dollars on recruiting agency fees
• Hired effectively and promptly, with minimal time investment from Hiring Manager

Incentivized

• Time savings identifying candidate information
• Multi touch multi medium communication campaigns, i.e., texting, emails, etc

Incentivized