FICO Blaze Advisor vs. InRule

FICO Blaze Advisor is suitable for cases where you have to deal with rules and where you want to customise the rules based on the business need then this product is very good to use. Also it provide easy deployment so, wherever there is frequent changes in deployment then this tool is good to use since it provides the direct deployment.

Incentivized

With InRule, we are expecting to be able to move business logic out of the developer domain and back into the business domain. Business logic is currently captured in UI (data validation) and middleware layers. These are areas in any application where leveraging InRule's capabilities allow for changes in business logic to be made with little or no IT involvement.

• Large customisation
• Create custom data item like variables
• Nice GUI, and user friendly

Incentivized

• It is easy to tweak business rule parameters.
• Create new logic with low barriers.

Incentivized

• Slow response
• Slow Notifications
• Less documentation and support

Incentivized

• Needs more debugging capabilities.

InRule's Support Portal provides a "one stop shop" for submitting support questions, accessing training information, managing licenses, and getting updates on InRule's roadmap.

Overall using FICO Blaze Advisor is good experience since change in any existing things were very easy in FICO Blaze Advisor, and I was easily able to make the change and deploy the things directly so that was real quick to check the things in the production, and this is the best point about FICO Blaze Advisor.

Incentivized

InRule offers a more organized software design, a well-structured framework in design, and is easier for new users to start contributing given documentation. Drools is spreadsheet-based and lacking the capability to do really advanced pseudo-programming.

Incentivized

• Overall positive impact
• Increase the efficiency
• Increase the productivity and quality

Incentivized

• It is always reliable and efficient.
• Has won customers over.